ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
Integrating image analysis with single cell RNA-seq data to study podocyte-specific changes in diabetic kidney disease.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inductive bias influences the spatial scale of biological features learned from images.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Podocytes in health and disease: from development to regeneration.Human cell · 2025Review
- Single cell sequencing and spatial multiomics of diabetic kidney segmentation insights zonation-specific therapeutic metabolic pathways.Cell insight · 2025Article
- The role of intercellular communication in diabetic nephropathy.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Advances and prospects for the Human BioMolecular Atlas Program (HuBMAP).Nature cell biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Podocyte injury plays a crucial role in the progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Injured podocytes demonstrate variations in nuclear shape and chromatin distribution. These morphometric changes have not yet been quantified in podocytes. Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms underlying these variations are poorly understood. Recent advances in omics have shed new lights into the biological mechanisms behind podocyte injury. However, there currently exists no study analyzing the biological mechanisms underlying podocyte morphometric variations during DKD. First, to study the importance of nuclear morphometrics, we performed morphometric quantification of podocyte nuclei from whole slide images of renal tissue sections obtained from murine models of DKD. Our results indicated that podocyte nuclear textural features demonstrate statistically significant difference in diabetic podocytes when compared to control. Additionally, the morphometric features demonstrated the existence of multiple subpopulations of podocytes suggesting a potential cause for their varying response to injury. Second, to study the underlying pathophysiology, we employed single cell RNA sequencing data from the murine models. Our results again indicated five subpopulations of podocytes in control and diabetic mouse models, validating the morphometrics-based results. Additionally, gene set enrichment analysis revealed epithelial to mesenchymal transition and apoptotic pathways in a subgroup of podocytes exclusive to diabetic mice, suggesting the molecular mechanism behind injury. Lastly, our results highlighted two distinct lineages of podocytes in control and diabetic cases suggesting a phenotypical change in podocytes during DKD. These results suggest that textural variations in podocyte nuclei may be key to understanding the pathophysiology behind podocyte injury.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.