Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37817872›Full record

ArticleTelemedicine reports2023

Development of an Implementation Science Telehealth Toolkit to Promote Research Capacity in Evaluation of Telehealth Programs.

Emily E Johnson, Ryan Kruis, Rebecca Verdin, Elana Wells, Dee W Ford, Katherine R Sterba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Telemedicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily E JohnsonCollege of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5313-326X
Ryan KruisCenter for Telehealth, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Rebecca VerdinCenter for Telehealth, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4517-4149
Elana WellsCenter for Telehealth, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Dee W FordDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Katherine R SterbaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The field of telehealth is rapidly growing and expanding access to quality health care, although there have been varied implementation outcomes in telehealth modalities. Dissemination and implementation (D&I) research can provide a systematic approach to identifying barriers and facilitators to telehealth implementation processes and outcomes. Methods: An interdisciplinary research and clinical team developed an implementation science telehealth toolkit to guide D&I evaluations of new and existing telehealth innovations. Results: The toolkit includes a separate section to correspond to each step in the D&I evaluation process. Each section includes resources to guide evaluation steps, telehealth specific considerations, and case study examples based on three completed telehealth evaluations. Discussion: The field of telehealth is forecasted to continue to expand, with potential to increase health care access to populations in need. This toolkit can help guide health care stakeholders to develop and carry out evaluations to improve understanding of telehealth processes and outcomes to maximize implementation and sustainability of these valuable innovations.

Indexed as

disseminationimplementation sciencetelehealthtoolkit

Identifiers

PMID37817872
PMCPMC10561742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.