Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37817789›Full record

ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2023

The efficacy of reinforcement of glass fibers and ZrO

Raghad S Jamel, Maha A Al-Murad, Emad Farhan Alkhalidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raghad S JamelDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.
Maha A Al-MuradDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.
Emad Farhan AlkhalidiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: to investigate and compare the reinforcing effects of glass fibers (GFs) and ZrO Methods: A total of one hundred and twenty specimens of autopolymerizing PMMA were prepared for FS, MH, and SR tests and grouped as follows: no additives (control group), for the tested groups, different ratios of GFs and ZrO Results: The unreinforced group had the lowest FS, MH, and SR mean values followed by (0%GFs + 5% ZrO Conclusion: Hybrid reinforcement with GFs, ZrO

Indexed as

Glass fibersProvisional restorationZrO2 nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID37817789
PMCPMC10562113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.