Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37817785›Full record

ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2023

Influence of rough micro-threaded and laser micro-textured implant-neck on peri-implant tissues: A systematic review.

Wayel Mohammed Huraib, Fawaz Pullishery, Thamer Abdulmohshin Al-Ghalib, Adham Abdulmajeed Tash Niyazi, Haitham Binhuraib, Mahmoud El Homossany, Malak Saeed Bamigdad

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. [Research progress on three-dimensional finite element analysis for fixed implant restoration of edentulous jaw].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wayel Mohammed HuraibDepartment of Prosthodontics, Dentistry Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah 21442, Saudi Arabia.
Fawaz PullisheryDivision of Dental Public Health, Dentistry Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah 21442, Saudi Arabia.
Thamer Abdulmohshin Al-GhalibDepartment of Prosthodontics, Dentistry Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah 21442, Saudi Arabia.
Adham Abdulmajeed Tash NiyaziDepartment of Prosthodontics, Dentistry Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah 21442, Saudi Arabia.
Haitham BinhuraibConsultant in Prosthodontics, North Jeddah Specialized Dental Center, King Abdullah Medical Complex, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mahmoud El HomossanyDepartment of Removable Prosthodontics, Ain Shams University, Egypt and Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah 21442, Saudi Arabia.
Malak Saeed BamigdadDepartment of Prosthodontics, Dentistry Program, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah 21442, Saudi Arabia.
Batterjee Medical CollegeAin Shams University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: This systematic review aimed to explore clinical outcomes of marginal or crestal bone level (MBL) and soft tissue status around implants, following the placement of rough micro-threaded/laser-microtextured surface (LMS) implants. These outcomes are compared with those following the placement of smooth machined-neck implants. Materials and methods: Using EBSCO Information Services, we conducted a web-based search of databases such as the PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE, for relevant English-language scientific papers published between January 2013 and August 2022. Prospective or retrospective controlled cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the role of rough micro-threaded/LMS implant necks on MBL, sulcular probing depth (PD), and/or clinical attachment loss, were included in this review. Results: From a comprehensive literature search of 247 articles, 6 RCTs, 5 prospective studies, and 4 retrospective studies (n = 15) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. MBL with rough micro-threaded implant necks ranged from 0.12 ± 0.17 mm to 3.25 ± 0.4 mm after loading. The smooth machined-neck implants without a micro-threaded neck had a loading MBL of 0.38 ± 0.51 mm to 3.75 ± 0.4 mm. Micro-threaded implant necks showed much lower MBL than machined-neck implants. LMS implant necks had a lower Conclusion: Under functional loading, a roughened micro-threaded design for the implant neck could significantly lower MBL. Furthermore, PD and MBL were much lower around LMS neck implants than those around machined-neck or micro-threaded implants.

Indexed as

Laser-microstructured implantsMachined-neckMarginal bone lossMicro-threaded implantsPeri-implantitis

Identifiers

PMID37817785
PMCPMC10562115
OpenAlexW4379259633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.