Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37817775›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2023

Global trade network patterns are coupled to fisheries sustainability.

Laura G Elsler, Maartje Oostdijk, Jessica A Gephart, Christopher M Free, Junfu Zhao, Eden Tekwa, Elaine M Bochniewicz, Alfredo Giron-Nava, Andrew F Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura G ElslerStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 11419 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5515-0856
Maartje OostdijkSchool of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Iceland, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8995-9597
Jessica A GephartDepartment of Environmental Science, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6836-9291
Christopher M FreeBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2557-8920
Junfu ZhaoInstitute of Marxism, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4489-1100
Eden TekwaDepartment of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1B1, Canada.
Elaine M BochniewiczThe MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA 22102, USA.
Alfredo Giron-NavaStanford Center for Ocean Solutions, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.
Andrew F JohnsonMarine SPACE group, The Lyell Centre, Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Currie, Scotland EH14 4AS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3365-8768

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of seafood trade networks alongside the decline in biomass of many marine populations raises important questions about the role of global trade in fisheries sustainability. Mounting empirical and theoretical evidence shows the importance of trade development on commercially exploited species. However, there is limited understanding of how the development of trade networks, such as differences in connectivity and duration, affects fisheries sustainability. In a global analysis of over 400,000 bilateral trade flows and stock status estimates for 876 exploited fish and marine invertebrates from 223 territories, we reveal patterns between seafood trade network indicators and fisheries sustainability using a dynamic panel regression analysis. We found that fragmented networks with strong connectivity within a group of countries and weaker links between those groups (modularity) are associated with higher relative biomass. From 1995 to 2015, modularity fluctuated, and the number of trade connections (degree) increased. Unlike previous studies, we found no relationship between the number or duration of trade connections and fisheries sustainability. Our results highlight the need to jointly investigate fisheries and trade. Improved coordination and partnerships between fisheries authorities and trade organizations present opportunities to foster more sustainable fisheries.

Indexed as

marine fisheriesnetwork analysisresilienceseafood tradeserial exploitationstock status assessment

Identifiers

PMID37817775
PMCPMC10560747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.