ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2023
Limb salvage and functional recovery in infected nonunion of the distal tibia treated with the Ilizarov techniques.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tibial bone transport using external fixation in adults: a systematic review.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Successful Salvage of Infected Tibial Shaft Non-union After Implant Removal with Ilizarov External Fixation: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Ilizarov Bone Transport for Distal Tibial Defects in Refractory Osteomyelitis: A Retrospective Study.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Article
- Demographics and Comorbidities of United States Service Members with Combat-Related Lower Extremity Limb Salvage.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Treatment of infected nonunion of the distal juxta-articular tibia is a challenge due to a short distal fragment, deformity, thin soft-tissue envelope, and active infection. There is still no consensus on the approach that is able to maximally salvage the limb and ankle function. Material and methods: Infected juxta-articular nonunion of the distal tibia was managed with two Ilizarov techniques, monofocal compression (MC) used in 12 patients and bifocal compression-distraction (BCD) in 6 patients. The choice of the technique depended on the size of the postresection defect, ≥3 cm or ≤3 cm, respectively. The tactics of functional approach were careful debridement, insertion of wires in the distal fragment so that they do not penetrate the ankle joint, stable fixation, and temporary bridging of the ankle and forefoot. MSCT was used along with regular radiography to assess the union and regeneration. Ankle functions were evaluated with AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score system. Results: Bone consolidation, infection arrest and ankle function improvement were achieved in all patients. External fixation continued 221.7 ± 15.1 days for MC and 235 ± 25.8 days for BCD. Complications were wound divergence, wire-tract infection, premature consolidation of the fibula, and hypoplastic regeneration in one case. The mean functional AOFAS score after treatment was 90.7 ± 2.5 points in MC and 89.7 ± 1.3 in BCD patients. Residual limb discrepancy after MC ranged 0-4 cm. Bone shortening was compensated in BCD patients. Conclusion: Limb-salvage and functional approach to the treatment of infected nonunion of the juxta-articular distal tibia with the Ilizarov techniques achieves good outcomes. It provides bone infection arrest, consolidation, defect compensation and significantly improves the ankle joint function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.