Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37817666›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

The Effect of Breathy Vocal Quality on Speech Intelligibility and Listening Effort in Background Noise.

Jing Shen, Elizabeth Heller Murray, Erin R Kulick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predicting Communication-Related Quality of Life in Children With Velopharyngeal Dysfunction.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Nonlinear vocal phenomena and speech intelligibility.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing ShenDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9192-6383
Elizabeth Heller MurrayDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Erin R KulickDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Temple University · US

Funding

Identifying the perceptual factors that contribute to older listeners'''' dynamic pitch benefit for speech recognition in noise.R21DC017560 · NIDCD · WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY · PI SHEN, JING · 2019 to 2021
$454k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC017560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech perception is challenging under adverse conditions. However, there is limited evidence regarding how multiple adverse conditions affect speech perception. The present study investigated two conditions that are frequently encountered in real-life communication: background noise and breathy vocal quality. The study first examined the effects of background noise and breathiness on speech perception as measured by intelligibility. Secondly, the study tested the hypothesis that both noise and breathiness affect listening effort, as indicated by linear and nonlinear changes in pupil dilation. Low-context sentences were resynthesized to create three levels of breathiness (original, mild-moderate, and severe). The sentences were presented in a fluctuating nonspeech noise with two signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of -5 dB (favorable) and -9 dB (adverse) SNR. Speech intelligibility and pupil dilation data were collected from young listeners with normal hearing thresholds. The results demonstrated that a breathy vocal quality presented in noise negatively affected speech intelligibility, with the degree of breathiness playing a critical role. Listening effort, as measured by the magnitude of pupil dilation, showed significant effects with both severe and mild-moderate breathy voices that were independent of noise level. The findings contributed to the literature by demonstrating the impact of vocal quality on the perception of speech in noise. They also highlighted the complex dynamics between overall task demand and processing resources in understanding the combined impact of multiple adverse conditions.

Indexed as

Speech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionCognitionHearingHumansListening EffortNoisebackground noiselistening effortspeech perceptionvocal quality

Identifiers

PMID37817666
PMCPMC10566269
OpenAlexW4387515788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.