Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37817581›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2023

A tumour-spheroid manufacturing and cryopreservation process that yields a highly reproducible product ready for direct use in drug screening assays.

Md Shafiullah Shajib, Kathryn Futrega, Anthony M Davies, Rose Ann G Franco, Eamonn McKenna, Bianca Guillesser, Travis J Klein, Ross W Crawford, Michael R Doran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Md Shafiullah ShajibSchool of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1071-6868
Kathryn FutregaCentre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3411-6768
Anthony M DaviesTranslational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Rose Ann G FrancoCentre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Eamonn McKennaCentre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Bianca GuillesserSchool of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Travis J KleinCentre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6669-7766
Ross W CrawfordCentre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6079-1316
Michael R DoranSchool of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5876-4757

Funding

The role of stem cells in skeletal health and diseaseZIADE000380 · NIDCR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH · PI ROBEY, PAMELA G · 2009 to 2025
$30.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DE000380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If it were possible to purchase tumour-spheroids as a standardised product, ready for direct use in assays, this may contribute to greater research reproducibility, potentially reducing costs and accelerating outcomes. Herein, we describe a workflow where uniformly sized cancer tumour-spheroids are mass-produced using microwell culture, cryopreserved with high viability, and then cultured in neutral buoyancy media for drug testing. C4-2B prostate cancer or MCF-7 breast cancer cells amalgamated into uniform tumour-spheroids after 48 h of culture. Tumour-spheroids formed from 100 cells each tolerated the cryopreservation process marginally better than tumour-spheroids formed from 200 or 400 cells. Post-thaw, tumour-spheroid metabolic activity was significantly reduced, suggesting mitochondrial damage. Metabolic function was rescued by thawing the tumour-spheroids into medium supplemented with 10 µM

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsSpheroids, CellularCryopreservationDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansMaleReproducibility of Resultsbuoyancycryopreservationmetabolic activitymicrowelltumour-spheroids

Identifiers

PMID37817581
PMCPMC10565407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.