Use of angled-tip aspiration catheters is associated with a lower cost of thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to large and medium vessel occlusions.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Early single-center experience with middle meningeal artery embolization using ZoomInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
   Article
2. Beyond the Catheter: Contemporary Aspiration Pump Systems in Neurointerventional Stroke Therapy.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
   Review
3. A single-center study of the RED 72 reperfusion catheter with SENDit technology in proximal large vessel occlusions.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as