Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37817066›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023

Multimodal hybrid convolutional neural network based brain tumor grade classification.

A Rohini, Carol Praveen, Sandeep Kumar Mathivanan, V Muthukumaran, Saurav Mallik, Mohammed S Alqahtani, Amal Al-Rasheed, Ben Othman Soufiene

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

A RohiniDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Anil Neerukonda Institute of Technology and Sciences, Vishakapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, 531162, India.
Carol PraveenDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SSM Institute of Engineering and Technology, Dindigul, Tamilnadu, India.
Sandeep Kumar MathivananSchool of Computing Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, 203201, India.
V MuthukumaranDepartment of Mathematics, College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamilnadu, 603203, India.
Saurav MallikDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Mohammed S AlqahtaniRadiological Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, 61421, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Amal Al-RasheedDepartment of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, 11671, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ben Othman SoufienePRINCE Laboratory Research, ISITcom, Hammam Sousse, University of Sousse, 4000, Sousse, Tunisia. soufiene.benothman@isim.u-gabes.tn.
Galgotias University · INPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SASocial Service Sericulture Project Trust · INSRM Institute of Science and Technology · INUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Sousse · TN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An abnormal growth or fatty mass of cells in the brain is called a tumor. They can be either healthy (normal) or become cancerous, depending on the structure of their cells. This can result in increased pressure within the cranium, potentially causing damage to the brain or even death. As a result, diagnostic procedures such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography, as well as blood and urine tests, are used to identify brain tumors. However, these methods can be labor-intensive and sometimes yield inaccurate results. Instead of these time-consuming methods, deep learning models are employed because they are less time-consuming, require less expensive equipment, produce more accurate results, and are easy to set up. In this study, we propose a method based on transfer learning, utilizing the pre-trained VGG-19 model. This approach has been enhanced by applying a customized convolutional neural network framework and combining it with pre-processing methods, including normalization and data augmentation. For training and testing, our proposed model used 80% and 20% of the images from the dataset, respectively. Our proposed method achieved remarkable success, with an accuracy rate of 99.43%, a sensitivity of 98.73%, and a specificity of 97.21%. The dataset, sourced from Kaggle for training purposes, consists of 407 images, including 257 depicting brain tumors and 150 without tumors. These models could be utilized to develop clinically useful solutions for identifying brain tumors in CT images based on these outcomes.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedCustomized CNNDeep learningMagnetic resonance imageTransfer learningTumor classificationVGG19

Identifiers

PMID37817066
PMCPMC10566188
OpenAlexW4387496070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.