ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024
An Analysis of Risk Factors of Recipient Site Temporary Effluvium After Follicular Unit Excision: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complications in follicular unit excision hair transplantation: current evidence and practical approaches.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTemporary hair loss at the recipient site after hair restoration surgery is called shock loss (SL). This study analyzed the risk factors for SL among patients who received follicular unit excision. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study included 621 patients (554 males and 67 females). Twenty-three patients had SL (9 males and 14 females with a mean age of 40.8 years). The prevalence of SL was analyzed in relation to sex, age, graft follicular units, cause of alopecia, diabetes mellitus, smoking, drinking alcohol, and local anesthesia agent.
resultsSex was identified as a risk factor for SL (odds ratio [OR]: 30.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.43-96.55; p<0.001). Among female patients, age was identified as a risk factor for SL (OR:1.07; 95% CI 1.00-1.15; p=0.039). Over 40 years, the female pattern hair loss group had a significantly higher risk for SL than a female cosmetic group younger than 39 years.
conclusionSex was the only risk factor found for SL in this study. In addition, age was identified as a risk factor for SL among female patients. We believe our results provide information and risk factors for SL, not only for hair transplant surgeons, but also patients who will receive follicular unit excision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.