ArticleScientific reports2023
Multiclass malaria parasite recognition based on transformer models and a generative adversarial network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac echocardiographic analysis with multi-scale effective fusion module: a novel stroke prediction approach.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Adversarial Robustness and Clinical Safety of Quantized Hierarchical Transformers for Edge-Based Malaria Microscopy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Automated Malaria Ring Form Classification in Blood Smear Images Using Ensemble Parallel Neural Networks.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-powered microscopy: Transforming the landscape of parasitology.Journal of microscopy · 2026Review
- Mobile phone-based plasmodium parasites stage detection from Giemsa stained blood smear by convolutional neural networks.Parasitology research · 2025Article
- Integrated visual transformer and flash attention for lip-to-speech generation GAN.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malaria is an extremely infectious disease and a main cause of death worldwide. Microscopic examination of thin slide serves as a common method for the diagnosis of malaria. Meanwhile, the transformer models have gained increasing popularity in many regions, such as computer vision and natural language processing. Transformers also offer lots of advantages in classification task, such as Fine-grained Feature Extraction, Attention Mechanism etc. In this article, we propose to assist the medical professionals by developing an effective framework based on transformer models and a generative adversarial network for multi-class plasmodium classification and malaria diagnosis. The Generative Adversarial Network is employed to generate extended training samples from multiclass cell images, with the aim of enhancing the robustness of the resulting model. We aim to optimize plasmodium classification to achieve an exact balance of high accuracy and low resource consumption. A comprehensive comparison of the transformer models to the state-of-the-art methods proves their efficiency in the classification of malaria parasite through thin blood smear microscopic images. Based on our findings, the Swin Transformer model and MobileVit outperform the baseline architectures in terms of precision, recall, F1-score, specificity, and FPR on test set (the data was divided into train: validation: test splits). It is evident that the Swin Transformer achieves superior detection performance (up to 99.8% accuracy), while MobileViT demonstrates lower memory usage and shorter inference times. High accuracy empowers healthcare professionals to conduct precise diagnoses, while low memory usage and short inference times enable the deployment of predictive models on edge devices with limited computational and memory resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.