ArticleScientific reports2023
Collective foraging of active particles trained by reinforcement learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mixing of a binary passive particle system using smart active particles.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Density Modulations in Active Colloidal Systems through Orthogonal Propulsion Control and Sensory Delays.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Anomalous Dynamics of Superparamagnetic Colloidal Microrobots with Tailored Statistics.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- Nonreciprocal field theory for decision-making in multi-agent control systems.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The 2025 motile active matter roadmap.Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal · 2025Review
- Heterogeneous foraging swarms can be better.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Collective self-organization of animal groups is a recurring phenomenon in nature which has attracted a lot of attention in natural and social sciences. To understand how collective motion can be achieved without the presence of an external control, social interactions have been considered which regulate the motion and orientation of neighbors relative to each other. Here, we want to understand the motivation and possible reasons behind the emergence of such interaction rules using an experimental model system of light-responsive active colloidal particles (APs). Via reinforcement learning (RL), the motion of particles is optimized regarding their foraging behavior in presence of randomly appearing food sources. Although RL maximizes the rewards of single APs, we observe the emergence of collective behaviors within the particle group. The advantage of such collective strategy in context of foraging is to compensate lack of local information which strongly increases the robustness of the resulting policy. Our results demonstrate that collective behavior may not only result on the optimization of behaviors on the group level but may also arise from maximizing the benefit of individuals. Apart from a better understanding of collective behaviors in natural systems, these results may also be useful in context of the design of autonomous robotic systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.