Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37816834›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2023

Toward an Effective Innovation Framework for Federal Grant-Making: an Exploration into OPA's Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program.

Mikayla Hyman, Sarah Philbrick

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mikayla HymanPartnership for Public Service, Washington, DC, USA.
Sarah PhilbrickPartnership for Public Service, Washington, DC, USA. sannphilbrick@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

States, local, tribal, and territorial governments received almost 20% of all federal spending in fiscal year 2022, about $1.2 trillion dollars (US Office of Management and Budget, 2023a). For a strong, well-functioning democracy, the federal government must be able to disperse grant funds efficiently and effectively. Rates of teen pregnancy in the USA, while decreasing in recent years, are still consistently higher than that of other western industrialized nations (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2023). The Office of Population Affairs' (OPA) Teen Pregnancy Prevention program combines cutting edge research with innovative grant distribution to creatively tackle this issue. In this commentary, we explore some of the strengths of OPA's grant distribution program in the hope that others may emulate best practices from this program. Specifically, the special issue highlights how OPA's grant program took a customer-centered focus by prioritizing work with end users and community. This evidence-based focus enabled the testing of ideas, which in turn could be iterated and scaled up. Through grantee innovation networks, they created space for external expertise, creative thinking, and diversity of thought. Other programs, policymakers, and their partners may learn from OPA's success, which arises from three core characteristics: (1) their funding stature allows long-term and flexible allocation of funding toward innovation; (2) OPA focuses on creating and supporting local communities and networks of innovation; (3) OPA emphasizes evidence-based decision-making and rigorous evaluation throughout the grant process. With a fifth of the federal budget being dispersed through grant-making and teen pregnancy still at high rates, OPA offers an exciting avenue for innovation and success in both of these areas. This commentary concludes with some recommendations for future practice.

Indexed as

Pregnancy in AdolescenceAdolescentCreativityDeveloped CountriesFemaleHumansPregnancySex EducationAdolescent sexual healthGrantsInnovationTeen pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37816834
PMCPMC10764394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.