ArticleScientific reports2023
γ-Aminobutyric acids (GABA) and serum GABA/AABA (G/A) ratio as potential biomarkers of physical performance and aging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Metabolomic insights into late-life depression: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Multilevel meta-analysis of the effect of exercise intervention on inhibitory control in children with ASD.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Repeated oral administration of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) does not cause reproductive or developmental toxicity in rats.Toxicology reports · 2026Article
- Longitudinal metabolomic profiling of biogenic amines in plasma and CSF, and their correlation, reveals sex-specific and age changes in TgF344 Alzheimer's disease transgenic and wildtype rats.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2026Article
- Metabolomic Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Atypical Parkinsonian Syndromes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- GABA-Producing Capabilities ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Pre-exercise mood, sex-specific hormonal and neuromodulatory responses to maximal exertion in elite rowers.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Clinical Trial Investigating Safety and Efficacy of Corn Leaf Extract on Sleep Quality in a Healthy Population With Difficulty Falling or Staying Asleep.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Quantum chemical study of molecular properties of small branched-chain amino acids in water.Amino acids · 2025Article
- Meeting report: the inaugural muscle biology and cachexia conference at the University of Houston, May 18-20, 2025, Houston, Texas, USA.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- L-β-aminoisobutyric acid, L-BAIBA, a marker of bone mineral density and body mass index, and D-BAIBA of physical performance and age.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Declining physical performance with age and disease is an important indicator of declining health. Biomarkers that identify declining physical performance would be useful in predicting treatment outcomes and identifying potential therapeutics. γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), a muscle autocrine factor, is a potent inhibitor of muscle function and works as a muscle relaxant. L-α-aminobutyric acid (L-AABA) is a biomarker for malnutrition, liver damage, and depression. We sought to determine if GABA and L-AABA may be useful for predicting physical performance. Serum levels of GABA and L-AABA were quantified in 120 individuals divided by age, sex, and physical capacity into low, average, and high performer groups. Analyses explored correlations between serum levels and physical performance. Both GABA and the ratio of GABA/AABA (G/A), but not AABA, were highly positively associated with age (Pearson correlations r = 0.35, p = 0.0001 for GABA, r = 0.31, p = 0.0007 for G/A, n = 120). GABA showed negative associations in the whole cohort with physical performance [fast gait speed, 6 min walk test (6MWT), PROMIS score, and SF36PFS raw score] and with subtotal and femoral neck bone mineral density. L-AABA was positively associated with usual gait speed, 6MWT, total SPPB score, and SF36PFS raw score in the total cohort of 120 human subjects, also with 6MWT and SF36PFS raw score in the 60 male subjects, but no associations were observed in the 60 females. As both GABA and L-AABA appear to be indicative of physical performance, but in opposite directions, we examined the G/A ratio. Unlike GABA, the G/A ratio showed a more distinct association with mobility tests such as total SPPB score, usual and fast gait speed, 6MWT, and SF36PFS raw score in the males, regardless of age and metabolic status. Serum G/A ratio could be potentially linked to physical performance in the male population. Our findings strongly suggest that GABA, L-AABA, and the G/A ratio in human serum may be useful markers for both age and physical function. These new biomarkers may significantly enhance the goal of identifying universal biomarkers to accurately predict physical performance and the beneficial effects of exercise training for older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.