Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37816770›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2023

Proteomic meta-study harmonization, mechanotyping and drug repurposing candidate prediction with ProHarMeD.

Klaudia Adamowicz, Lis Arend, Andreas Maier, Johannes R Schmidt, Bernhard Kuster, Olga Tsoy, Olga Zolotareva, Jan Baumbach, Tanja Laske

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Klaudia AdamowiczInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, 22607, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9418-4386
Lis ArendInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, 22607, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7990-8385
Andreas MaierInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, 22607, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4408-0068
Johannes R SchmidtDepartment of Preclinical Development and Validation, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology IZI, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2026-9715
Bernhard KusterChair of Proteomics and Bioanalytics, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9094-1677
Olga TsoyInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, 22607, Germany.
Olga ZolotarevaInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, 22607, Germany.
Jan BaumbachInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, 22607, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0282-0462
Tanja LaskeInstitute for Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, 22607, Germany. tanja.laske@uni-hamburg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7922-7595
Universität Hamburg · DEFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 01ZX1910BBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 01ZX1910DBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 01ZX2210DBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 161L0214AEC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 101057619EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 777111Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research, Switzerland | Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation (State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation) 22.00115Villum Fonden (Villum Foundation) 13154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomics technologies, which include a diverse range of approaches such as mass spectrometry-based, array-based, and others, are key technologies for the identification of biomarkers and disease mechanisms, referred to as mechanotyping. Despite over 15,000 published studies in 2022 alone, leveraging publicly available proteomics data for biomarker identification, mechanotyping and drug target identification is not readily possible. Proteomic data addressing similar biological/biomedical questions are made available by multiple research groups in different locations using different model organisms. Furthermore, not only various organisms are employed but different assay systems, such as in vitro and in vivo systems, are used. Finally, even though proteomics data are deposited in public databases, such as ProteomeXchange, they are provided at different levels of detail. Thus, data integration is hampered by non-harmonized usage of identifiers when reviewing the literature or performing meta-analyses to consolidate existing publications into a joint picture. To address this problem, we present ProHarMeD, a tool for harmonizing and comparing proteomics data gathered in multiple studies and for the extraction of disease mechanisms and putative drug repurposing candidates. It is available as a website, Python library and R package. ProHarMeD facilitates ID and name conversions between protein and gene levels, or organisms via ortholog mapping, and provides detailed logs on the loss and gain of IDs after each step. The web tool further determines IDs shared by different studies, proposes potential disease mechanisms as well as drug repurposing candidates automatically, and visualizes these results interactively. We apply ProHarMeD to a set of four studies on bone regeneration. First, we demonstrate the benefit of ID harmonization which increases the number of shared genes between studies by 50%. Second, we identify a potential disease mechanism, with five corresponding drug targets, and the top 20 putative drug repurposing candidates, of which Fondaparinux, the candidate with the highest score, and multiple others are known to have an impact on bone regeneration. Hence, ProHarMeD allows users to harmonize multi-centric proteomics research data in meta-analyses, evaluates the success of the ID conversions and remappings, and finally, it closes the gaps between proteomics, disease mechanism mining and drug repurposing. It is publicly available at https://apps.cosy.bio/proharmed/ .

Indexed as

Drug RepositioningProteomicsBiomarkersProteinsBiomarkersProteins

Identifiers

PMID37816770
PMCPMC10564802
OpenAlexW4387500925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.