Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37816663›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2023

Exploring the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of women of reproductive age towards fertility and elective oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility decline in the UK: a cross-sectional survey.

L S Kasaven, A Mitra, P Ostrysz, E Theodorou, S Murugesu, J Yazbek, T Bracewell-Milnes, J Ben Nagi, B P Jones, S Saso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Social Egg Freezing-A Trend or Modern Reality?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

L S KasavenDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1752-5220
A MitraDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK.
P OstryszDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
E TheodorouDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK.
S MurugesuDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
J YazbekDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK.
T Bracewell-MilnesDepartment of Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Lister Fertility Clinic, The Lister Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9827-4816
J Ben NagiDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Centre for Reproductive and Genetic Health, London, UK.
B P JonesDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0391-0443
S SasoDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionWhat are the knowledge, perceptions and attitudes towards fertility and elective oocyte cryopreservation (OC) for age-related fertility decline (ARFD) in women in the UK? SUMMARY ANSWER: Awareness of OC for ARFD has reportedly improved compared to studies carried out almost a decade ago, but inconsistencies in knowledge remain regarding the rate of miscarriage amongst specific age groups, the financial costs and optimal age to undergo OC for ARFD. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The age of first-time motherhood has increased amongst western societies, with many women of reproductive age underestimating the impact of age on fertility. Further understanding of women's awareness of their fertility, the options available to preserve it and the barriers for seeking treatment earlier are required in order to prevent the risk of involuntary childlessness. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A hyperlink to a cross-sectional survey was posted on social media (Instagram) between 25 February 2021 and 11 March 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsWomen from the general population aged 18-50 years were invited to complete the survey. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In total, 5482 women fulfilled the inclusion criteria and completed the survey. The mean age of participants was 35.0 years (SD 10.25; range 16-52). Three quarters (74.1%; n = 4055) disagreed or strongly disagreed they felt well informed regarding the options available to preserve their fertility, in case of a health-related problem or ARFD. The majority overestimated the risk of miscarriage in women aged ≥30 years old, with 14.5% correctly answering 20%, but underestimated the risks in women ≥40, as 20.1% correctly answered 40-50%. Three quarters (73.2%; n = 4007) reported an awareness of OC for ARFD and 65.8% (n = 3605) reported that they would consider undergoing the procedure. The number of women who considered OC for ARFD across age groups were as follows: 18-25 (8.3%; n = 300), 26-30 (35.8%; n = 1289), 31-35 (45.9%; n = 1654), 36-40 (9.6%; n = 347), 41-45 (0.3%; n = 13), and 46-50 (0.1%; n = 2). The majority of women (81.3%; n = 4443) underestimated the cost of a single cycle of OC for ARFD (<£5000). Furthermore, 10.4% (n = 566) believed a single cycle would be adequate enough to retrieve sufficient oocytes for cryopreservation. Approximately 11.0% (n = 599) believed OC for ARFD may pose significant health risks and affect future fertility. Less than half agreed or strongly agreed that the lack of awareness regarding OC for ARFD has impacted the likelihood of pursuing this method of fertility preservation further (41.4%; n = 2259). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Results from cross-sectional studies are limited as interpretations made are merely associations and not of causal relationships. The online nature of participant recruitment is subject to selection bias, considering women with access to social media are often from higher socioeconomic and education backgrounds, thus limiting generalizability of the findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsFurther education regarding the financial costs and optimal age to undergo elective OC to increase the chances of successful livebirth are required. Clinicians should encourage earlier fertility counselling to ensure that OC is deemed a preventative measure of ARFD, rather than an ultimate recourse to saving declining fertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was required for this article. There are no conflicts of interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousFertility PreservationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesCryopreservationFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLive BirthOocytesPregnancyUnited Kingdomage-related fertility declineage-specific fertility ratecross-sectional online surveyelective oocyte cryopreservationfertility awarenessfertility preservationinvoluntary childlessnessknowledge of fertilityknowledge of miscarriagereproductive aspirations

Identifiers

PMID37816663
PMCPMC10694402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.