Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37816224›Full record

ArticleDementia (London, England)2023

Roles and usages of neuro service dogs for caregivers living at home with persons with dementia: An exploratory comparative case study.

Claude Vincent, Frédéric S Dumont, Annette Rivard, Manon Rogers, Suzette Brémault-Phillips, Cary Brown, Bertrand Achou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claude VincentSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Université Laval, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5292-4035
Frédéric S DumontCentre of Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS/CN), Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4372-4741
Annette RivardDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0555-6713
Manon RogersCentre of Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de La Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS/CN), Canada.
Suzette Brémault-PhillipsDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4167-1815
Cary BrownDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5282-4170
Bertrand AchouCentre of Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CIUSSS/CN), Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0474-1028

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to examine how canine assistance may support family caregivers and persons with dementia and to document and compare two modalities of home care support. An exploratory comparative case study research design was conducted. Three cases correspond of dyads of a caregiver, a person with mild to moderate dementia, and either a neuro service dog (NSD), a companion dog or no dog. Hypotheses are formulated to capture differences between cases. Recruitment was done in a service dog organisation, through Canadian Alzheimer associations and in records of a hospital. Data were collected through 45-60 minutes telephone interviews that included completion of the Caregiver's Burden Scale and sociodemographic questions. We used an inductive approach with qualitative data. There were five caregivers (mean age 54.8 years) who had an NSD, 28 caregivers (63.6 years) who had a companion dog, and 23 caregivers (63.8 years) without dog. In the category of roles and usages of the dog, 'Socialisation' and 'Help with a sense of direction' were the most addressed roles for dyads with the NSD. For dyads with companion dog and without dog, 'Engagement-and-meaning of life' as well as 'Physical activity with the dog' were the most discussed roles. The 'Sleep or wake up' role was the least discussed role across three cases. In the other categories, they were seven advantages and 10 inconvenients that were mentioned for canine assistance. For home care support, the presence of NSD has more positive impacts on both the person with dementia and their caregiver compared to the presence of a companion dog; the presence of a NSD results in the person with dementia accessing more indoor and outdoor public sites than with a companion dog; and dyads with a dog are informally socially engaged more frequently than those with no dog.

Indexed as

DementiaHome Care ServicesAnimalsCanadaCaregiversDogsHumansMiddle AgedService Animalsassistance dogcaregiverscommunity dwellinghome care supportindependenceservice dogsocialisation

Identifiers

PMID37816224
PMCPMC10644692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.