ArticlePloS one2023
Association between psychological vulnerability and glaucoma progression: Protocol for a multicenter prospective cohort study in South Korea.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Depression and Anxiety in Patients With Irreversible Vision Loss: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.International journal of psychiatry in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The bidirectional enigma of glaucoma and anxiety: from neuroinflammatory mechanisms to mind-body integrated therapies.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- From meta-analysis to Mendelian randomization: Unidirectional perspectives on the association of glaucoma with depression and anxiety.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Research progress on glaucoma complicated with anxiety and depression.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Illness uncertainty, anxiety, and depression in primary glaucoma and associated influencing factors.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMental health is a significant concern for patients diagnosed with glaucoma, as visual impairment can have a profound impact on psychological well-being. Conversely, psychological vulnerability in glaucoma patients can negatively influence treatment adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy, thereby potentially exacerbating disease progression in a vicious cycle. The study protocol proposed herein aims to explore the impact of psychological states such as anxiety, depression, and stress on both medication adherence and progression of glaucoma. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study is to be a prospective multicenter study conducted at four tertiary medical centers. Patients recently diagnosed with glaucoma and not yet treated will be enrolled. Anxiety, depression, and stress scales will be administered at baseline, one year, and two years, along with glaucomatous assessments to be performed every six months. Validated questionnaires (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment [GAD-7], Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9], and Perceived Stress Scale-10 [PSS-10]) will assess anxiety, depression, and stress, respectively. The primary objective is to correlate post-diagnosis psychological status with medication adherence and disease progression. The effects of pre- and post-diagnosis changes in anxiety, depression, and stress on disease progression will be analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and logistic regression will be performed to identify clinical characteristics associated with increased risk of developing anxiety, depression, and stress in glaucoma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.