Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37816053›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Cooperation and deception through stigmergic interactions in human groups.

Thomas Bassanetti, Stéphane Cezera, Maxime Delacroix, Ramón Escobedo, Adrien Blanchet, Clément Sire, Guy Theraulaz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cooperation and deception through stigmergic interactions in human groups.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas BassanettiLaboratoire de Physique Théorique, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3346-8983
Stéphane CezeraToulouse School of Economics, CNRS, 31080 Toulouse, France.
Maxime DelacroixLaboratoire de Physique Théorique, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0009-0001-7267-9804
Ramón EscobedoCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France.
Adrien BlanchetToulouse School of Economics, CNRS, 31080 Toulouse, France.
Clément SireLaboratoire de Physique Théorique, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4089-4013
Guy TheraulazCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative, CNRS, Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3062-4215
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Marie Curie 655235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stigmergy is a generic coordination mechanism widely used by animal societies, in which traces left by individuals in a medium guide and stimulate their subsequent actions. In humans, new forms of stigmergic processes have emerged through the development of online services that extensively use the digital traces left by their users. Here, we combine interactive experiments with faithful data-based modeling to investigate how groups of individuals exploit a simple rating system and the resulting traces in an information search task in competitive or noncompetitive conditions. We find that stigmergic interactions can help groups to collectively find the cells with the highest values in a table of hidden numbers. We show that individuals can be classified into three behavioral profiles that differ in their degree of cooperation. Moreover, the competitive situation prompts individuals to give deceptive ratings and reinforces the weight of private information versus social information in their decisions.

Indexed as

DeceptionGroup ProcessesHumanscollective intelligencecomputational modelingdigital tracessocial influencestigmergy

Identifiers

PMID37816053
PMCPMC10589714
OpenAlexW4387504618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.