Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37815685›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2024

Evaluation of the image quality and validity of handheld echocardiography for stroke volume and left ventricular ejection fraction quantification: a method comparison study.

Frederique M de Raat, Joris van Houte, Leon J Montenij, Sjoerd Bouwmeester, Suzanne E A Felix, Peter Bingley, Esmée C de Boer, Patrick Houthuizen, Arthur R Bouwman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Frederique M de RaatDepartment of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. f.m.d.raat@tue.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4157-2745
Joris van HouteDepartment of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6526-2704
Leon J MontenijDepartment of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9001-3953
Sjoerd BouwmeesterDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8358-2231
Suzanne E A FelixDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3733-0081
Peter BingleyDepartment of Patient Care & Measurements, Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1921-1671
Esmée C de BoerDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Eindhoven, De Zaale, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0679-2742
Patrick HouthuizenDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9313-3344
Arthur R BouwmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2051-5947

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bedside quantification of stroke volume (SV) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is valuable in hemodynamically compromised patients. Miniaturized handheld ultrasound (HAND) devices are now available for clinical use. However, the performance level of HAND devices for quantified cardiac assessment is yet unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the validity of HAND measurements with standard echocardiography (SE) and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE). Thirty-six patients were scanned with HAND, SE and 3DE. LVEF and SV quantification was done with automated software for the HAND, SE and 3DE dataset. The image quality of HAND and SE was evaluated by scoring segmental endocardial border delineation (2 = good, 1 = poor, 0 = invisible). LVEF and SV of HAND was evaluated against SE and 3DE using correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. The correlation, bias, and limits of agreement (LOA) between HAND and SE were 0.68 [0.46:0.83], 1.60% [- 2.18:5.38], and 8.84% [- 9.79:12.99] for LVEF, and 0.91 [0.84:0.96], 1.32 ml [- 0.36:4.01], 15.54 ml [- 18.70:21.35] for SV, respectively. Correlation, bias, and LOA between HAND and 3DE were 0.55 [0.6:0.74], - 0.56% [- 2.27:1.1], and 9.88% [- 13.29:12.17] for LVEF, and 0.79 [0.62:0.89], 6.78 ml [2.34:11.21], 12.14 ml [- 26.32:39.87] for SV, respectively. The image quality scores were 9.42 ± 2.0 for the apical four chamber views of the HAND dataset and 10.49 ± 1.7 for the SE dataset and (P < 0.001). Clinically acceptable accuracy, precision, and image quality was demonstrated for HAND measurements compared to SE. In comparison to 3DE, HAND showed a clinically acceptable accuracy and precision for LVEF quantification.

Indexed as

Echocardiography, Three-DimensionalVentricular Function, LeftEchocardiographyHeart VentriclesHumansPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsStroke VolumeHandheld echocardiographyHemodynamic monitoringLeft ventricle ejection fractionPoint of care ultrasoundStroke volume

Identifiers

PMID37815685
PMCPMC10774204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.