Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37815676›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024

A preliminary exploration into top-down and bottom-up deep-learning approaches to localising neuro-interventional point targets in volumetric MRI.

Enora Giffard, Pierre Jannin, John S H Baxter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Enora GiffardLTSI - INSERM UMR 1099, Université de Rennes, 35000, Rennes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6238-4236
Pierre JanninLTSI - INSERM UMR 1099, Université de Rennes, 35000, Rennes, France.
John S H BaxterLTSI - INSERM UMR 1099, Université de Rennes, 35000, Rennes, France. john.baxter@univ-rennes.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePoint localisation is a critical aspect of many interventional planning procedures, specifically representing anatomical regions of interest or landmarks as individual points. This could be seen as analogous to the problem of visual search in cognitive psychology, in which this search is performed either: bottom-up, constructing increasingly abstract and coarse-resolution features over the entire image; or top-down, using contextual cues from the entire image to refine the scope of the region being investigated. Traditional convolutional neural networks use the former, but it is not clear if this is optimal. This article is a preliminary investigation as to how this motivation affects 3D point localisation in neuro-interventional planning.

methodsTwo neuro-imaging datasets were collected: one for cortical point localisation for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and the other for sub-cortical anatomy localisation for deep brain stimulation. Four different frameworks were developed using top-down versus bottom-up paradigms as well as representing points as co-ordinates or heatmaps. These networks were applied to point localisation for transcranial magnetic stimulation and subcortical anatomy localisation. These networks were evaluated using cross-validation and a varying number of training datasets to analyse their sensitivity to quantity of training data.

resultsEach network shows increasing performance as the amount of available training data increases, with the co-ordinate-based top-down network consistently outperforming the others. Specifically, the top-down architectures tend to outperform the bottom-up ones. An analysis of their memory consumption also encourages the top-down co-ordinate based architecture as it requires significantly less memory than either bottom-up architectures or those representing their predictions via heatmaps.

conclusionThis paper is a preliminary foray into a fundamental aspect of machine learning architectural design: that of the top-down/bottom-up divide from cognitive psychology. Although there are additional considerations within the particular architectures investigated that could affect these results and the number of architectures investigated is limited, our results do indicate that the less commonly used top-down paradigm could lead to more efficient and effective architectures in the future.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerBottom-upBrainDeep learningLocalizationMRITop-down

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.