Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37815608›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2023

[Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging : Pros and cons in axial spondyloarthritis].

Kay Geert A Hermann, Torsten Diekhoff

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 71% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kay Geert A HermannKlinik für Radiologie, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. kgh@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6142-3814
Torsten DiekhoffKlinik für Radiologie, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3593-1449
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis depends on direct visualization of the sacroiliitis in addition to clinical assessment and determination of the histocompatibility antigen HLA-B27. While the value of conventional radiographic images has meanwhile been described in many studies as insufficient to diagnose the disease at an early stage, magnetic resonance imaging and also computed tomography now offer the possibility to visualize findings, such as bone marrow edema, erosion, fat metaplasia, backfill and ankylosis. Thus, it is necessary to decide which procedure should be used and when. Furthermore, both cross-sectional imaging techniques are currently undergoing major changes, and technical advancements are making great strides every year. This article provides an overview of which future technologies will be included in the rheumatological diagnostics of the sacroiliac joints. This overview also illustrates which standard methods are established in the diagnostics of axial spondyloarthritis and how they are used.

Indexed as

Axial SpondyloarthritisSacroiliitisSpondylarthritisSpondylitis, AnkylosingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSacroiliac JointTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnkylosing spondylitisCross-sectional imagingSacroiliac jointSacroiliitisTechnical developments

Identifiers

PMID37815608
OpenAlexW4387473490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.