ReviewGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2024
Efficacy comparison of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs for the treatment of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity: A network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Review in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of regression, reactivation, retreatment and retinal detachment after injections of three different anti-VEGF drugs for retinopathy of prematurity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Therapeutic outcomes of ranibizumab for zone ii stage 2 retinopathy of prematurity with plus disease.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Dose adjustment of intravitreal medications and gases according to axial length and vitreous cavity volume.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2025Article
- The analysis of foveal microvascular anomalies in retinopathy of prematurity after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy using optical coherence tomography angiography.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Investigating Predictors of Retreatment following Initial Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of current ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the efficacy of different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in preterm infants.
methodsSeven databases were searched for eligible literature up to February 22, 2023. Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of anti-VEGF agents for ROP in infants. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed. We also conducted subgroup analyses to determine the efficacy ranking of regimens used in different regions. The odds ratio (OR), standardised mean difference (SMD), and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were calculated for each outcome.
resultsThirteen RCTs of 10 different regimens, involving 1196 infants (2388 eyes), were identified. Bevacizumab (0.625 mg; OR = 0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06-0.40, SUCRA = 80.6%) and conbercept (0.15 mg; OR = 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.30, SUCRA = 96.0%) were the most effective regimens in reducing the risk of ROP recurrence requiring retreatment in Western countries and China, respectively. Compared with laser therapy, bevacizumab (0.625 mg; SMD = 1.54, 95% CI 0.06-3.02) achieved significantly longer intervals between treatment and recurrence. No significant difference in the risk of retinal detachment was detected between any anti-VEGF agent and laser (p > 0.05).
conclusionsBevacizumab (0.625 mg) and conbercept (0.15 mg) appeared to be the most effective therapies for ROP in Western countries and China, respectively. More high-quality RCTs are warranted to evaluate the efficacy and long-term safety of anti-VEGF drugs for the management of ROP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.