Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37815566›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2023

A Multilevel Primary Care Intervention to Improve Follow-Up of Overdue Abnormal Cancer Screening Test Results: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Steven J Atlas, Anna N A Tosteson, Adam Wright, E John Orav, Timothy E Burdick, Wenyan Zhao, Shoshana J Hort, Amy J Wint, Rebecca E Smith, Frank Y Chang and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03979495 (mFOCUS), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03979495 nacompletednot on this map

mFOCUS (Multilevel FOllow-up of Cancer Screening)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled11,980ConditionsCancerArmsmFOCUS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Application of patient navigation programs across the entire continuum of breast cancer care: a GRADE-assessed systematic review with meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Predicting the Future by Studying the Past for Patients With Cancer Diagnosed in the Emergency Department.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  14. Assessing Management of Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Results and Concordance with Guideline Recommendations in Three US Healthcare Settings.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Appointments aren't Access: The Hidden Work of Getting Care.Journal of primary care & community health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Steven J AtlasDivision of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Anna N A TostesonDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Adam WrightDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
E John OravDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Timothy E BurdickDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Wenyan ZhaoDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Shoshana J HortDepartment of Medicine, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Amy J WintDivision of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Rebecca E SmithDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Frank Y ChangDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
David G AmanResearch Computing, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Mathan ThillaiyapillaiSYNERGY Research Informatics, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Courtney J DiamondDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Li ZhouDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jennifer S HaasDivision of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Funding

Promoting follow-up of abnormal cancer screening tests using population-basedsystems to support stepped care multilevel interventionU01CA225451 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ATLAS, STEVEN J, HAAS, JENNIFER S · 2018 to 2022
$4.2M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA225451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Realizing the benefits of cancer screening requires testing of eligible individuals and processes to ensure follow-up of abnormal results. Objective: To test interventions to improve timely follow-up of overdue abnormal breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer screening results. Design, Setting, and Participants: Pragmatic, cluster randomized clinical trial conducted at 44 primary care practices within 3 health networks in the US enrolling patients with at least 1 abnormal cancer screening test result not yet followed up between August 24, 2020, and December 13, 2021. Intervention: Automated algorithms developed using data from electronic health records (EHRs) recommended follow-up actions and times for abnormal screening results. Primary care practices were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to (1) usual care, (2) EHR reminders, (3) EHR reminders and outreach (a patient letter was sent at week 2 and a phone call at week 4), or (4) EHR reminders, outreach, and navigation (a patient letter was sent at week 2 and a navigator outreach phone call at week 4). Patients, physicians, and practices were unblinded to treatment assignment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was completion of recommended follow-up within 120 days of study enrollment. The secondary outcomes included completion of recommended follow-up within 240 days of enrollment and completion of recommended follow-up within 120 days and 240 days for specific cancer types and levels of risk. Results: Among 11 980 patients (median age, 60 years [IQR, 52-69 years]; 64.8% were women; 83.3% were White; and 15.4% were insured through Medicaid) with an abnormal cancer screening test result for colorectal cancer (8245 patients [69%]), cervical cancer (2596 patients [22%]), breast cancer (1005 patients [8%]), or lung cancer (134 patients [1%]) and abnormal test results categorized as low risk (6082 patients [51%]), medium risk (3712 patients [31%]), or high risk (2186 patients [18%]), the adjusted proportion who completed recommended follow-up within 120 days was 31.4% in the EHR reminders, outreach, and navigation group (n = 3455), 31.0% in the EHR reminders and outreach group (n = 2569), 22.7% in the EHR reminders group (n = 3254), and 22.9% in the usual care group (n = 2702) (adjusted absolute difference for comparison of EHR reminders, outreach, and navigation group vs usual care, 8.5% [95% CI, 4.8%-12.0%], P < .001). The secondary outcomes showed similar results for completion of recommended follow-up within 240 days and by subgroups for cancer type and level of risk for the abnormal screening result. Conclusions and Relevance: A multilevel primary care intervention that included EHR reminders and patient outreach with or without patient navigation improved timely follow-up of overdue abnormal cancer screening test results for breast, cervical, colorectal, and lung cancer. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03979495.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisEarly Detection of CancerHealth CommunicationNeoplasmsPrimary Health CareReminder SystemsAftercareAgedColorectal NeoplasmsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMass ScreeningMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID37815566
PMCPMC10565610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.