Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37815487›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2023

Human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived ovarian support cell co-culture improves oocyte maturation in vitro after abbreviated gonadotropin stimulation.

Sabrina Piechota, Maria Marchante, Alexa Giovannini, Bruna Paulsen, Kathryn S Potts, Graham Rockwell, Caroline Aschenberger, Alexander D Noblett, Alexandra B Figueroa, Marta Sanchez and 20 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reproduction (Re)defined.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Oocyte collection and outcome following oncologic treatment: a retrospective multicentre study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sabrina PiechotaGameto Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Maria MarchanteGameto Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Alexa GiovanniniGameto Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Bruna PaulsenGameto Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Kathryn S PottsGameto Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Graham RockwellGameto Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Caroline AschenbergerGameto Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Alexander D NoblettGameto Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Alexandra B FigueroaGameto Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Marta SanchezRuber Juan Bravo University Hospital, Eugin Group, Madrid, Spain.
Ferran BarrachinaGameto Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Klaus WiemerKEW Technology, Seattle, WA, USA.
Luis GuzmanPranor Clinic, Lima, Peru.
Pedro BelchinRuber Juan Bravo University Hospital, Eugin Group, Madrid, Spain.
Merrick Pierson SmelaWyss Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Patrick R J FortunaWyss Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Pranam ChatterjeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Nam D TranSpring Fertility, New York, NY, USA.
Dawn A KelkExtend Fertility, New York, NY, USA.
Marcy FortiExtend Fertility, New York, NY, USA.
Shelby MarcinyshynExtend Fertility, New York, NY, USA.
Trozalla SmithSpring Fertility, New York, NY, USA.
David H McCullohGameto Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Marta-Julia Fernandez-GonzalezGameto Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Baruch AbittanExtend Fertility, New York, NY, USA.
Silvia OrtizPranor Clinic, Lima, Peru.
Joshua U KleinExtend Fertility, New York, NY, USA.
Peter KlatskySpring Fertility, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel Ordonez-PerezRuber Juan Bravo University Hospital, Eugin Group, Madrid, Spain.
Christian C KrammeGameto Inc., New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7518-8111
GameDesk · USNew Hope Fertility Center · USHarvard University · USBiogen (United States) · USDuke University · US

Funding

Gameto Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionCan in vitro maturation (IVM) and developmental competence of human oocytes be improved by co-culture with ovarian support cells (OSCs) derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs)? SUMMARY ANSWER: OSC-IVM significantly improves the rates of metaphase II (MII) formation and euploid Day 5 or 6 blastocyst formation, when compared to a commercially available IVM system. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: IVM has historically shown highly variable performance in maturing oocytes and generating oocytes with strong developmental capacity, while limited studies have shown a positive benefit of primary granulosa cell co-culture for IVM. We recently reported the development of OSCs generated from hiPSCs that recapitulate dynamic ovarian function in vitro. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The study was designed as a basic science study, using randomized sibling oocyte specimen allocation. Using pilot study data, a prospective sample size of 20 donors or at least 65 oocytes per condition were used for subsequent experiments. A total of 67 oocyte donors were recruited to undergo abbreviated gonadotropin stimulation with or without hCG triggers and retrieved cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were allocated between the OSC-IVM or control conditions (fetal-like OSC (FOSC)-IVM or media-only IVM) in three independent experimental design formats. The total study duration was 1 April 2022 to 1 July 2023. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsOocyte donors between the ages of 19 and 37 years were recruited for retrieval after informed consent, with assessment of anti-Mullerian hormone, antral follicle count, age, BMI and ovarian pathology used for inclusion and exclusion criteria. In experiment 1, 27 oocyte donors were recruited, in experiment 2, 23 oocyte donors were recruited, and in experiment 3, 17 oocyte donors and 3 sperm donors were recruited. The OSC-IVM culture condition was composed of 100 000 OSCs in suspension culture with hCG, recombinant FSH, androstenedione, and doxycycline supplementation. IVM controls lacked OSCs and contained either the same supplementation, FSH and hCG only (a commercial IVM control), or FOSCs with the same supplementation (Media control). Experiment 1 compared OSC-IVM, FOSC-IVM, and a Media control, while experiments 2 and 3 compared OSC-IVM and a commercial IVM control. Primary endpoints in the first two experiments were the MII formation (i.e. maturation) rate and morphological quality assessment. In the third experiment, the fertilization and embryo formation rates were assessed with genetic testing for aneuploidy and epigenetic quality in blastocysts. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We observed a statistically significant improvement (∼1.5×) in maturation outcomes for oocytes that underwent IVM with OSCs compared to control Media-IVM and FOSC-IVM in experiment 1. More specifically, the OSC-IVM group yielded a MII formation rate of 68% ± 6.83% SEM versus 46% ± 8.51% SEM in the Media control (P = 0.02592, unpaired t-test). FOSC-IVM yielded a 51% ± 9.23% SEM MII formation rate which did not significantly differ from the media control (P = 0.77 unpaired t-test). Additionally, OSC-IVM yielded a statistically significant ∼1.6× higher average MII formation rate at 68% ± 6.74% when compared to 43% ± 7.90% in the commercially available IVM control condition (P = 0.0349, paired t-test) in experiment 2. Oocyte morphological quality between OSC-IVM and the controls did not significantly differ. In experiment 3, OSC-IVM oocytes demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in Day 5 or 6 euploid blastocyst formation per COC compared to the commercial IVM control (25% ± 7.47% vs 11% ± 3.82%, P = 0.0349 logistic regression). Also in experiment 3, the OSC-treated oocytes generated blastocysts with similar global and germline differentially methylated region epigenetic profiles compared commercial IVM controls or blastocysts after either conventional ovarian stimulation. LARGE SCALE DATA: N/A. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: While the findings of this study are compelling, the cohort size remains limited and was powered on preliminary pilot studies, and the basic research nature of the study limits generalizability compared to randomized control trials. Additionally, use of hCG-triggered cycles results in a heterogenous oocyte cohort, and potential differences in the underlying maturation state of oocytes pre-IVM may limit or bias findings. Further research is needed to clarify and characterize the precise mechanism of action of the OSC-IVM system. Further research is also needed to establish whether these embryos are capable of implantation and further development, a key indication of their clinical utility. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsTogether, these findings demonstrate a novel approach to IVM with broad applicability to modern ART practice. The controls used in this study are in line with and have produced similar to findings to those in the literature, and the outcome of this study supports findings from previous co-culture studies that found benefits of primary granulosa cells on IVM outcomes. The OSC-IVM system shows promise as a highly flexible IVM approach that can complement a broad range of stimulation styles and patient populations. Particularly for patients who cannot or prefer not to undergo conventional gonadotropin stimulation, OSC-IVM may present a viable path for obtaining developmentally competent, mature oocytes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): A.D.N., A.B.F., A.G., B.P., C.A., C.C.K., F.B., G.R., K.S.P., K.W., M.M., P.C., S.P., and M.-J.F.-G. are shareholders in the for-profit biotechnology company Gameto Inc. P.R.J.F. declares paid consultancy for Gameto Inc. P.C. also declares paid consultancy for the Scientific Advisory Board for Gameto Inc. D.H.M. has received consulting services from Granata Bio, Sanford Fertility and Reproductive Medicine, Gameto, and Buffalo IVF, and travel support from the Upper Egypt Assisted Reproduction Society. C.C.K., S.P., M.M., A.G., B.P., K.S.P., G.R., and A.D.N. are listed on a patent covering the use of OSCs for IVM: U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/492,210. Additionally, C.C.K. and K.W. are listed on three patents covering the use of OSCs for IVM: U.S. Patent Application No. 17/846,725, U.S Patent Application No. 17/846,845, and International Patent Application No.: PCT/US2023/026012. C.C.K., M.P.S., and P.C. additionally are listed on three patents for the transcription factor-directed production of granulosa-like cells from stem cells: International Patent Application No.: PCT/US2023/065140, U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/326,640, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/444,108. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsIn Vitro Oocyte Maturation TechniquesAdultCoculture TechniquesFemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneGonadotropinsHumansMaleOocytesPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesSemenYoung AdultFollicle Stimulating HormoneGonadotropinsabbreviated stimulationblastocystsembryoseuploidygranulosa cellsin vitro maturationoocyte qualityovarian support cellsstem cells

Identifiers

PMID37815487
PMCPMC10694404
OpenAlexW4387472746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.