ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2023
Microbial inoculants with higher capacity to colonize soils improved wheat drought tolerance.
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthetic microbial communities mediate maize growth and soil microecology under saline-alkali stress.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Genotype-Specific Interactions Between Wheat and Rhizosphere Microbiome Under Drought Stress.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Microbial consortia and drought tolerance- A paradigm shift towards agro-ecological sustainability.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Fast track to environmentally adapted rhizobia for growing soybean at northern latitudes using citizen science.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Isolation, identification, and plant growth-promoting mechanisms of strain BN5, with a focus on exogenously Trp-independent IAA biosynthesis, and its impact on cucumber cultivation.Current research in microbial sciences · 2026Article
- Combined application of organic and microbial amendments reshapes soil microbiome diversity and improves soybean growth performance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Activation dynamics and assembly of root zone soil bacterial communities in response to stress-associated phytohormones.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Seasonal Differences in Effects of Microbial Communities on Duckweed Traits.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Quantification and Determination of Compatible Bacterial Consortia.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- Effects of different growing environments on strawberry growth and yield.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Insights intoPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agriculture: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Impact of effective micro-organisms (EM) on the yield, growth and bio-chemical properties of lettuce when applied to soil and leaves.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- How are microbes helping end hunger?Microbial biotechnology · 2024Article
- Culturomics- and metagenomics-based insights into the soil microbiome preservation and application for sustainable agriculture.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Microbial inoculants with higher capacity to colonize soils improved wheat drought tolerance.Microbial biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial inoculants have gained increasing attention worldwide as an eco-friendly solution for improving agriculture productivity. Several studies have demonstrated their potential benefits, such as enhanced resistance to drought, salinity, and pathogens. However, the beneficial impacts of inoculants remain inconsistent. This variability is attributed to limited knowledge of the mechanisms by which microbial inoculants affect crop growth and a lack of ecological characteristics of these inoculants that limit our ability to predict their beneficial effects. The first important step is believed to be the evaluation of the inoculant's ability to colonize new habitats (soils and plant roots), which could provide crops with beneficial functions and improve the consistency and efficiency of the inoculants. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of three microbial inoculants (two bacterial: P1 and P2, and one fungal: P3) on the growth and stress responses of three wheat varieties in two different soil types under drought conditions. Furthermore, we investigated the impact of microbial inoculants on soil microbial communities. Plant biomass and traits were measured, and high-throughput sequencing was used to characterize bulk and rhizosphere soil microbiomes after exposure to drought stress. Under drought conditions, plant shoot weight significantly increased (11.37%) under P1 treatments compared to uninoculated controls. In addition, total nitrogen enzyme activity increased significantly under P1 in sandy soil but not in clay soil. Importantly, network analyses revealed that P1, consisting of Bacillus paralicheniformis and Bacillus subtilis, emerged as the keystone taxa in sandy soil. Conversely, P2 and P3 failed to establish as keystone taxa, which may explain their insignificant impact on wheat performance under drought conditions. In conclusion, our study emphasizes the importance of effective colonization by microbial inoculants in promoting crop growth under drought conditions. Our findings support the development of microbial inoculants that robustly colonize plant roots for improved agricultural productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.