Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37815197›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

Comparative evaluation of a surface-based respiratory monitoring system against a pressure sensor for 4DCT image reconstruction in phantoms.

Abdallah Qubala, Jehad Shafee, Vania Batista, Jakob Liermann, Marcus Winter, Daniel Piro, Oliver Jäkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdallah QubalaHeidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6526-2453
Jehad ShafeeHeidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.
Vania BatistaNational Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2733-4134
Jakob LiermannHeidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.
Marcus WinterHeidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniel PiroHeidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.
Oliver JäkelHeidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftHeidelberg University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT), which relies on breathing-induced motion, requires realistic surrogate information of breathing variations to reconstruct the tumor trajectory and motion variability of normal tissues accurately. Therefore, the SimRT surface-guided respiratory monitoring system has been installed on a Siemens CT scanner. This work evaluated the temporal and spatial accuracy of SimRT versus our commonly used pressure sensor, AZ-733 V. A dynamic thorax phantom was used to reproduce regular and irregular breathing patterns acquired by SimRT and Anzai. Various parameters of the recorded breathing patterns, including mean absolute deviations (MAD), Pearson correlations (PC), and tagging precision, were investigated and compared to ground-truth. Furthermore, 4DCT reconstructions were analyzed to assess the volume discrepancy, shape deformation and tumor trajectory. Compared to the ground-truth, SimRT more precisely reproduced the breathing patterns with a MAD range of 0.37 ± 0.27 and 0.92 ± 1.02 mm versus Anzai with 1.75 ± 1.54 and 5.85 ± 3.61 mm for regular and irregular breathing patterns, respectively. Additionally, SimRT provided a more robust PC of 0.994 ± 0.009 and 0.936 ± 0.062 for all investigated breathing patterns. Further, the peak and valley recognition were found to be more accurate and stable using SimRT. The comparison of tumor trajectories revealed discrepancies up to 7.2 and 2.3 mm for Anzai and SimRT, respectively. Moreover, volume discrepancies up to 1.71 ± 1.62% and 1.24 ± 2.02% were found for both Anzai and SimRT, respectively. SimRT was validated across various breathing patterns and showed a more precise and stable breathing tracking, (i) independent of the amplitude and period, (ii) and without placing any physical devices on the patient's body. These findings resulted in a more accurate temporal and spatial accuracy, thus leading to a more realistic 4DCT reconstruction and breathing-adapted treatment planning.

Indexed as

Four-Dimensional Computed TomographyLung NeoplasmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRespiration4DCT reconstructionbreathing detectionbreathing surrogatecommissioningmobile tumorsmotion artifactsrespiratory monitoring systemSurface-guided radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37815197
PMCPMC10860430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.