Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37815181›Full record

ArticleCurrent computer-aided drug design2024

Diksha Choudhary, Rajwinder Kaur, Nidhi Rani, Thakur Gurjeet Singh, Bhupinder Kumar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current computer-aided drug design, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Novel indole alkaloids from the flower buds ofJournal of ginseng research · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diksha ChoudharyChitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
Rajwinder KaurChitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
Nidhi RaniChitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
Thakur Gurjeet SinghChitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
Bhupinder KumarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, HNB Garhwal University, Chauras Campus, Srinagar, Garhwal, Uttarakhand, 246174, India.
Chitkara University · INHemwati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGinseng (

objectiveTo explore the potential of phytoconstituents of

methodsA total of sixty-one phytoconstituents of ginseng were drawn with the help of ChemBioDraw Ultra 12.0 software and PDBs for MAO-A enzyme were retrieved from the RCSB PDB database. The prepared ligands were screened for MAO-A properties using the software Molegro Virtual Docker (MVD 2010.4.1.0). All the prepared ligands were evaluated for drug-likeliness properties using Swiss ADME.

resultsAmong the docking studies of 60 Ginseng phytochemicals including one standard, 15 phytoconstituents with the highest dock score and better binding interactions were selected further for absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) studies. Stachyose (-227.287, 17 interactions), Raffinose (-222.157, 14 interactions), and Ginsenoside Rg1 (-216.593, 10 interactions) were found to possess better interactions as compared to Clorgyline taken as a standard drug.

conclusionStachyose was found to be the most potent inhibitor of MAO-A enzyme under investigation and can be a potential lead molecule for the development of newer phytochemical-based treatment of depression.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationMonoamine OxidaseMonoamine Oxidase InhibitorsPanaxPhytochemicalsComputer SimulationHumansLigandsLigandsMonoamine OxidaseMonoamine Oxidase InhibitorsPhytochemicalsADMEdiseasesginesinosideginsengMAO-Amental healthmolecular dockingplantsstachyose.

Identifiers

PMID37815181
OpenAlexW4387472797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.