Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37815156›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of clinical oncology2024

Use of clinical variables for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.

Yuta Ueno, Emiko Yoshida, Shuko Nojiri, Tomoyasu Kato, Takashi Ohtsu, Toshiyuki Takeshita, Shunji Suzuki, Hiroshi Yoshida, Ken Kato, Masayoshi Itoh and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Yuta UenoDepartment of Gynecology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Emiko YoshidaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuko NojiriClinical Research and Trial Center, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoyasu KatoDepartment of Gynecology, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi OhtsuDivision of Advanced Cancer Therapeutics, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, Yokohama, Japan.
Toshiyuki TakeshitaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunji SuzukiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi YoshidaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken KatoClinical Research Support Office, Biobank Translational Research Support Section, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayoshi ItohLaboratory for Advanced Genomics Circuit, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Tsuguto NotomiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kengo UsuiMedical Technology Innovation Center, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi SozuDepartment of Information and Computer Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhisa TeraoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideya KawajiResearch Center for Genome and Medical Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Hisamori KatoDepartment of Gynecology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Juntendo University · JPNippon Medical School · JPKanagawa Cancer CenterNTT Medical Center · JPRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences · JPTokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science · JPTokyo University of Agriculture and Technology · JPYokohama Welfare Service Association · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 18cm0106433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEndometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological cancer, and most patients are identified during early disease stages. Noninvasive evaluation of lymph node metastasis likely will improve the quality of clinical treatment, for example, by omitting unnecessary lymphadenectomy.

methodsThe study population comprised 611 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent lymphadenectomy at four types of institutions, comprising seven hospitals in total. We systematically assessed the association of 18 preoperative clinical variables with postoperative lymph node metastasis. We then constructed statistical models for preoperative lymph node metastasis prediction and assessed their performance with a previously proposed system, in which the score was determined by counting the number of high-risk variables among the four predefined ones.

resultsOf the preoperative 18 variables evaluated, 10 were significantly associated with postoperative lymph node metastasis. A logistic regression model achieved an area under the curve of 0.85 in predicting lymph node metastasis; this value is significantly higher than that from the previous system (area under the curve, 0.74). When we set the false-negative rate to ~1%, the new predictive model increased the rate of true negatives to 21%, compared with 6.8% from the previous one. We also provide a spreadsheet-based tool for further evaluation of its ability to predict lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.

conclusionsOur new lymph node metastasis prediction method, which was based solely on preoperative clinical variables, performed significantly better than the previous method. Although additional evaluation is necessary for its clinical use, our noninvasive system may help improve the clinical treatment of endometrial cancer, complementing minimally invasive sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesModels, Statisticalendometrial cancerlymphadenectomylymph node metastasisprobabilistic predictionrisk factor

Identifiers

PMID37815156
PMCPMC10773201
OpenAlexW4387473167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.