Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37814952›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2023

Pilot study of a ketogenic diet in bipolar disorder.

Nicole Needham, Iain H Campbell, Helen Grossi, Ivana Kamenska, Benjamin P Rigby, Sharon A Simpson, Emma McIntosh, Pankaj Bahuguna, Ben Meadowcroft, Frances Creasy and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. BJPsych open · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole NeedhamCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3610-1669
Iain H CampbellCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Helen GrossiDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, NHS Lothian, UK.
Ivana KamenskaUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Benjamin P RigbySchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, UK.
Sharon A SimpsonSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, UK.
Emma McIntoshHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment, University of Glasgow, UK.
Pankaj BahugunaHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment, University of Glasgow, UK.
Ben MeadowcroftPsychiatry, NHS Lothian, UK.
Frances CreasyPsychiatry, NHS Lothian, UK.
Maja Mitchell-GrigorjevaBipolar Scotland, UK.
John NorrieUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Gerard ThompsonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Melissa C GibbsCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Ailsa McLellanDepartment of Paediatric Neurology, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, NHS Lothian, UK.
Cheryl FisherDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Hospital for Children and Young People, NHS Lothian, UK.
Tessa MosesCentre for Engineering Biology, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Karl BurgessCentre for Engineering Biology, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Rachel BrownPsychiatry, NHS Lothian, UK.
Michael J ThrippletonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Harry CampbellUsher Institute, University of Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6169-6262
Daniel J SmithCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2267-1951
University of Edinburgh · GBNHS Lothian · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/1The Dunhill Medical Trust R380R/1114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent evidence from case reports suggests that a ketogenic diet may be effective for bipolar disorder. However, no clinical trials have been conducted to date.

aimsTo assess the recruitment and feasibility of a ketogenic diet intervention in bipolar disorder.

methodEuthymic individuals with bipolar disorder were recruited to a 6-8 week trial of a modified ketogenic diet, and a range of clinical, economic and functional outcome measures were assessed. Study registration number: ISRCTN61613198.

resultsOf 27 recruited participants, 26 commenced and 20 completed the modified ketogenic diet for 6-8 weeks. The outcomes data-set was 95% complete for daily ketone measures, 95% complete for daily glucose measures and 95% complete for daily ecological momentary assessment of symptoms during the intervention period. Mean daily blood ketone readings were 1.3 mmol/L (s.d. = 0.77, median = 1.1) during the intervention period, and 91% of all readings indicated ketosis, suggesting a high degree of adherence to the diet. Over 91% of daily blood glucose readings were within normal range, with 9% indicating mild hypoglycaemia. Eleven minor adverse events were recorded, including fatigue, constipation, drowsiness and hunger. One serious adverse event was reported (euglycemic ketoacidosis in a participant taking SGLT2-inhibitor medication).

conclusionsThe recruitment and retention of euthymic individuals with bipolar disorder to a 6-8 week ketogenic diet intervention was feasible, with high completion rates for outcome measures. The majority of participants reached and maintained ketosis, and adverse events were generally mild and modifiable. A future randomised controlled trial is now warranted.

Indexed as

Bipolar type I or II disordersclinical outcomes measuresmetabolic psychiatryneurophysiologyother imaging

Identifiers

PMID37814952
PMCPMC10594182
OpenAlexW4387472241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.