ReviewTranslational pediatrics2023
Minimal invasive approaches for pediatric & congenital heart surgery: safe, reproducible, more cosmetic than through sternotomy, and here to stay.
Review in Translational pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preferred age for beating-heart atrial septal defect repair via right subaxillary mini-incision in pediatric patients.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Effect of Chronic Pediatric Heart Conditions on Family Dynamics in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Minimally Invasive Repair of Sinus Venosus Atrial Septal Defects and Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Connections via Vertical Right Axillary Thoracotomy.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Over 3,000 Minimally Invasive Thoracotomies From the European Congenital Heart Surgeons Association for Quality Repairs of the Most Common Congenital Heart Defects: Safe and Routine for Selected Repairs.World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery · 2025Article
- Creating opportunities from challenging anatomy: Left axillary thoracotomy for closure of ventricular septal defect in an infant with situs solitus and extreme levoposition of the heart.JTCVS techniques · 2025Article
- Hybrid approach: a prospective option for treating congenital heart defects in pediatric patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimal invasive approaches through small thoracic incisions for the isolated repair of the most common congenital heart defects have been around for decades. However, the lack of belonging in established surgical training curriculums compared to the traditional median sternotomy, the requirement for more technical expertise and a certain learning curve, has limited their use, being routinely performed only by certain surgeons in specialized centers. More recently, through cumulated and increasingly mediatized shared experience, remote teaching potential through universally accessible surgical videos and simulation, the approach has gained traction and acceptance, and even established itself as the new norm in many centers. In this review, we present technically focused aspects of our own experience and protocols which have evolved over time, along with a brief overview of the literature pertaining to other right thoracic approaches, and some comparison to established results using the traditional median sternotomy. An increasing body of literature, produced more frequently and across all continents, seems to suggest that repairs of congenital heart defects through a minimal invasive right thoracic approach are becoming the new norm, as they are reported to be safe and reproducible, with excellent surgical results, and an obvious superior and more desirable cosmetic result. This comes at a cost of additional training and learning curve by surgeons, who are not offered the technique as part of their standard professional training curriculum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.