Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37814698›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2023

Adjuvant intraluminal therapies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Raymond Khargi, Christopher Connors, Anna Ricapito, Alan J Yaghoubian, Blair E Gallante, Johnathan A Khusid, William M Atallah, Mantu Gupta

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Raymond KhargiDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Christopher ConnorsDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Anna RicapitoDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Alan J YaghoubianDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Blair E GallanteDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Johnathan A KhusidDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
William M AtallahDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Mantu GuptaDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUCs) are often identified and first treated endoscopically. After proper risk stratification, adjuvant treatment may be recommended. Consequently, as adjuvant therapy becomes more common place in the oncological armamentarium, we seek to better characterize its existing and future therapeutic landscape. In this article, we present an overview of the most up-to-date information about intracavitary instillations as an adjuvant therapy in the context of UTUC. We reviewed the current literature on the epidemiology, disease characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of UTUC with a particularly focus on intraluminal adjuvant therapy for UTUC. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the most recent available data regarding adjuvant therapies used for UTUC. Intraluminal therapy plays an increasingly important role in the management of UTUC. Mitomycin C is the most common adjuvant treatment for UTUC with bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) being utilized to a lesser extent. UGN-101 is a novel topical gel-based therapy that has shown promising results and thus recently garnered Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for UTUC. Other treatments such as BCG-IFN, gemcitabine, docetaxel, and drug-eluting stents (DES) may play a future role in UTUC treatment given further research. It is important to caveat that current studies on topical adjuvant treatments demonstrate varying degrees of effectiveness. This is largely due to limited research on UTUC, consisting of small sample sizes, and mostly retrospective experiences. Accordingly, further clinical trials are needed to evaluate the true benefit of these treatments.

Indexed as

adjuvant therapyintracavitary treatmentkidney-sparing surgeryUpper tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID37814698
PMCPMC10560344
OpenAlexW4386783046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.