ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2023
Clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A bibliometric study and visualization analysis of the current status and perspectives in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.Medicine · 2026Article
- Salvage treatment of a metastatic colorectal cancer with pMMR/MSS in a 21-year-old man: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (mUTUC) is a malignant cancer associated with poor prognosis. Few studies have investigated the clinical outcome of a recently developed combination regimen of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor plus nab-paclitaxel in mUTUC. Methods: We retrospectively retrieved data from the electronic medical records of cisplatin-ineligible or cisplatin-refractory mUTUC patients from five participating Chinese centers, who received treatment of PD-1 inhibitor plus nab-paclitaxel between April 2018 and January 2022. Clinical response was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The confirmed overall response rate (ORR) was 14/34 (41.2%), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 24/34 (70.6%). Complete response (CR) was achieved in one case, partial response (PR) in 13 cases (38.2%), stable disease (SD) in 10 cases (29.4%), and progressive disease (PD) occurred in 10 cases (29.4%). After a median follow-up period of 16.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.9-22.1], 14 deaths were reported, with a median OS of 15.0 months (95% CI: 9.9-20.1); 22 progressions were reported, with a median PFS of 6.0 months (95% CI: 2.4-9.6). Patients with visceral metastasis had a similar PFS [hazard ratio (HR): 1.28, 95% CI: 0.53-3.09, P=0.574) and OS (HR: 1.94, 95% CI: 0.64-5.83, P=0.279] to patients with lymph node metastasis only. Conclusions: This real-world study suggests that PD-1 inhibitor plus nab-paclitaxel is effective in cisplatin-ineligible and cisplatin-refractory mUTUC patients with acceptable toxicity, especially for patients with visceral metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.