Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37814437›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility2023

Real-world Prescription Patterns and Patient Satisfaction Regarding Maintenance Therapy of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: An Observational, Cross-sectional, Multicenter Study.

Cheal Wung Huh, Nak Hoon Son, Young Hoon Youn, Da Hyun Jung, Min Kyung Kim, Eun Jeong Gong, Kyu Chan Huh, Seung Young Kim, Moo In Park, Ju Yup Lee and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Drug Therapy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Cheal Wung HuhDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7327-8503
Nak Hoon SonDepartment of Statistics, Keimyung University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6192-8852
Young Hoon YounDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0071-229X
Da Hyun JungDepartment of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Min Kyung KimDepartment of Statistics, Keimyung University, Daegu, Korea.
Eun Jeong GongDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, Korea.
Kyu Chan HuhDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Korea.
Seung Young KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Moo In ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Ju Yup LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Joong Goo KwonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Jae Hak KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Cheol Min ShinDepartments of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Kee Wook JungDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Su Jin HongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Bucheon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Hee Man KimHealth Promotion, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Suck Chei ChoiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Jeollabuk-do, Korea.
Hye-Kyung JungDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hyun Jin KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Changwon, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea.
Kwang Jae LeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8534-0850
Keimyung University · KRYonsei University · KRChangwon National University · KRAjou University · KRDaegu Catholic University · KRDongguk University · KREwha Womans University · KRHallym University · KRKonyang University · KRKorea University · KRKosin University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSoonchunhyang University · KRUlsan College · KRWonkwang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic gastrointestinal disorder that typically requires long-term maintenance therapy. However, little is known about patient preferences and satisfaction and real-world prescription patterns regarding maintenance therapy for GERD. Methods: This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study involved patients from 18 referral hospitals in Korea. We surveyed patients who had been prescribed proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for GERD for at least 90 days with a minimum follow-up duration of 1 year. The main outcome was overall patient satisfaction with different maintenance therapy modalities. Results: A total of 197 patients were enrolled. Overall patient satisfaction, patient preferences, and GERD health-related quality of life scores did not significantly differ among the maintenance therapy modality groups. However, the on-demand therapy group experienced a significantly longer disease duration than the continuous therapy group. The continuous therapy group demonstrated a lower level of awareness of potential adverse effects associated with PPIs than the on-demand therapy group but received higher doses of PPIs than the on-demand therapy group. The prescribed doses of PPIs also varied based on the phenotype of GERD, with higher doses prescribed for non-erosive reflux disease than erosive reflux disease. Conclusion: Although overall patient satisfaction did not significantly differ among the different PPI maintenance therapy modality groups, awareness of potential adverse effects was significantly different between the on-demand and continuous therapy groups.

Indexed as

Gastroesophageal refluxMaintenanceProton pump inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID37814437
PMCPMC10577463
OpenAlexW4387472845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.