ReviewCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2023
Cases of familial idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus implicate genetic factors in disease pathogenesis.
Review in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic Risk Factors in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: What We Know and What Is Next.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025Pooled it
- Brain and intracranial volumes are both enlarged and serve as potential risk factors in normal pressure hydrocephalus.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Familial vs sporadic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a comparative study.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Low prevalence of CWH43 variants among Finnish and Norwegian idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients: a cohort-based observational study.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is a disorder of unknown pathophysiology whose diagnosis is paradoxically made by a positive response to its proposed treatment with cerebrospinal fluid diversion. There are currently no idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus disease genes or biomarkers. A systematic analysis of familial idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus could aid in clinical diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment stratification, and elucidate disease patho-etiology. In this 2-part analysis, we review literature-based evidence for inheritance of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in 22 pedigrees, and then present a novel case series of 8 familial idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients. For the case series, demographics, familial history, pre- and post-operative symptoms, and cortical pathology were collected. All novel familial idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients exhibited improvement following shunt treatment and absence of neurodegenerative cortical pathology (amyloid-beta and hyperphosphorylated tau), in contrast to many sporadic cases of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus with variable clinical responses. Analysis of the 30 total familial idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus cases reported herein is highly suggestive of an autosomal dominant mechanism of inheritance. This largest-ever presentation of multiply affected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus pedigrees provides strong evidence for Mendelian inheritance and autosomal dominant transmission of an idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus trait in a subset of patients that positively respond to shunting and lack neurodegenerative pathology. Genomic investigation of these families may identify the first bona fide idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus disease gene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.