SynthesisItalian journal of pediatrics2023
The efficacy and ocular safety following aflibercept, conbercept, ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and laser for retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of anti-VEGF therapy versus laser therapy on mortality and treatment outcomes in retinopathy of prematurity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Pooled it
- Epidemiology and treatment trends of retinopathy of prematurity: a multi-center study involving four Asian centers and one European center (2016-2023).Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of regression, reactivation, retreatment and retinal detachment after injections of three different anti-VEGF drugs for retinopathy of prematurity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The social and economic burden of retinopathy of prematurity: screening, treatment, and health policy perspectives in a transnational narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Real-World Visual and Anatomical Outcomes of Laser Therapy versus Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injection for Retinopathy of Prematurity: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study at a Tertiary Center in Thailand.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Laser Photocoagulation Subsequent to Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Retinopathy of Prematurity Long-Term Efficacy in Extremely Low Birth Weight Twins.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Article
- Construction of a nomogram model to predict the risk of retinopathy of prematurity reactivate after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: a retrospective study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Retinopathy of prematurity epidemiology and treatment trend in a tertiary medical center in Taiwan: From 2016 to 2023.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyArticle
- Investigating Predictors of Retreatment following Initial Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of current ophthalmologyReview
- Circulating VEGF-A Levels in Relation to Retinopathy of Prematurity and Treatment Effects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ophthalmology scienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is typically treated with laser photocoagulation and/or intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF). To the best of our knowledge, most systematic reviews have focused on comparing anti-VEGF against laser treatment while comparisons between different anti-VEGF agents are lacking. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of different anti-VEGF agents or laser after primary ROP therapy.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive search across multiple databases up to November 2022. We included studies that used anti-VEGF or laser for ROP with comparable cohorts.
resultsOverall, 44 studies were included in this meta-analysis. When comparing anti-VGEF with laser, we found that the anti-VEGF group had a significantly higher retreatment rate (RR = 1.56, 95%CI = [1.06, 2.31], p = 0.03), a longer time from treatment to retreatment (WMD = 5.99 weeks, 95%CI = [4.03, 7.95], p < 0.001), a lower retinal detachment rate (RR = 0.55, 95%CI = [0.30, 0.91], p = 0.02), higher spherical equivalent (WMD = 1.69D, 95%CI = [0.61, 2.77], p = 0.002), lower myopia rate (RR = 0.69, 95%CI = [0.50, 0.97], p = 0.03) and lower anisometropia rate (RR = 0.44, 95%CI = [0.29, 0.67], p = 0.0001). In comparisons between ranibizumab and bevacizumab, the intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) group was associated with higher recurrence rate (RR = 2.02, 95%CI = [1.49, 2.73], p < 0.0001), higher retreatment rate (RR = 1.70, 95%CI = [1.17, 2.47], p = 0.0006), and lower high myopia rate (RR = 0.31, 95%CI = [0.12, 0.77], p = 0.01). Similarly, when compared to aflibercept and conbercept, the IVR cohort also demonstrated higher recurrence and retreatment rates. While no significant differences were observed in any of the variables included in the statistical analysis in the comparison between bevacizumab and aflibercept.
conclusionsAnti-VEGF was associated with higher retreatment and lesser incidence of myopia as compared to laser. Laser therapy was linked to more complications like retinal detachment and myopia. Ranibizumab exhibited higher recurrence and retreatment rates compared to bevacizumab, aflibercept, and conbercept.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.