Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37814288›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

On Scene Injury Severity Prediction (OSISP) model for trauma developed using the Swedish Trauma Registry.

Anna Bakidou, Eva-Corina Caragounis, Magnus Andersson Hagiwara, Anders Jonsson, Bengt Arne Sjöqvist, Stefan Candefjord

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna BakidouDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden. bakidou@chalmers.se.
Eva-Corina CaragounisDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Per Dubbsgatan 15, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Magnus Andersson HagiwaraCenter for Prehospital Research, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, 501 90, Borås, Sweden.
Anders JonssonCenter for Prehospital Research, Faculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, 501 90, Borås, Sweden.
Bengt Arne SjöqvistDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Stefan CandefjordDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding optimal care for trauma, the leading cause of death for young adults, remains a challenge e.g., due to field triage limitations in assessing a patient's condition and deciding on transport destination. Data-driven On Scene Injury Severity Prediction (OSISP) models for motor vehicle crashes have shown potential for providing real-time decision support. The objective of this study is therefore to evaluate if an Artificial Intelligence (AI) based clinical decision support system can identify severely injured trauma patients in the prehospital setting.

methodsThe Swedish Trauma Registry was used to train and validate five models - Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Network - in a stratified 10-fold cross validation setting and hold-out analysis. The models performed binary classification of the New Injury Severity Score and were evaluated using accuracy metrics, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Precision-Recall curve (AUCPR), and under- and overtriage rates.

resultsThere were 75,602 registrations between 2013-2020 and 47,357 (62.6%) remained after eligibility criteria were applied. Models were based on 21 predictors, including injury location. From the clinical outcome, about 40% of patients were undertriaged and 46% were overtriaged. Models demonstrated potential for improved triaging and yielded AUC between 0.80-0.89 and AUCPR between 0.43-0.62.

conclusionsAI based OSISP models have potential to provide support during assessment of injury severity. The findings may be used for developing tools to complement field triage protocols, with potential to improve prehospital trauma care and thereby reduce morbidity and mortality for a large patient population.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceWounds and InjuriesAccidents, TrafficHumansInjury Severity ScoreRetrospective StudiesSwedenTriageYoung AdultArtificial Intelligence (AI)Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS)Field triageOn Scene Injury Severity Prediction (OSISP)Prehospital careTrauma

Identifiers

PMID37814288
PMCPMC10561449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.