Observational studySurgical endoscopy2023
Analysis of recurrence and risk factors in laparoscopic sandwich technique for parastomal hernia repair.
Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk prediction model for parastomal hernia after colorectal cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of different mesh placement techniques for parastomal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Pooled it
- End-colostomy parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review on laparoscopic and robotic approaches.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Long-term outcomes of open local onlay mesh parastomal hernia repair with ostomy revision.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Preliminary Results of Extraperitoneal Rectus Abdominis Anterior Sigmoid Colostomy (ERASC) for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia Following Abdominoperineal Resection.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Sandwich parastomal hernia repair, a prospective observational study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Observational
- The TRAPPIST Repair: A Novel TRAnsabdominal PrePeritoneal Intervention for ParaSTomal Hernias - Case Report With Video-Vignette.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionParastomal hernias are frequent and highly recurrent. The sandwich technique is a combination of the keyhole and Sugarbaker techniques, using a double intraperitoneal mesh. The objective of this study was to assess the outcomes of the sandwich technique, specifically focusing on recurrence rates. MATERIALS AND
methodsObservational retrospective study conducted in two tertiary referral centers in Catalonia, Spain. All consecutive patients who underwent parastomal hernia repair using the sandwich technique between 1st January 2016 and 31st December 2021 were included.
resultsA total of 38 patients underwent the laparoscopic sandwich technique for parastomal hernia repair. The overall recurrence rate was 7.9% (3/38), with a median follow-up of 39 months (IQR: 12.3-56.5). According to the EHS classification for parastomal hernia, there were 47.4% (18/38) type I defects, 10.5% (4/38) type II defects, 28.9% (11/38) type III defects, and 13.2% (5/38) type IV defects. The used mesh was predominantly TiMesh® (76.3%; 29/38), followed by DynaMesh® IPOM (23.7%; 9/38). Patients with recurrence exhibited higher rates of seroma, hematoma, surgical site infection, and one case of early recurrence attributed to mesh retraction. Consequently, postoperative complications emerged as the primary risk factor for hernia recurrence.
conclusionThe sandwich technique demonstrated recurrence rates consistent with those reported in the existing literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37814164What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.