ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
Crohn's disease inflammation severity assessment with iodine density from photon counting CT enterography: comparison with endoscopic histopathology.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing photon counting CT enterography: determining the optimal virtual monoenergy for bowel imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Approaches, advantages, and challenges to photon counting detector and multi-energy CT.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Review
- Back to the Future: Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Photon-Counting Detector CT for the Detection of Pituitary Adenoma in Cushing Disease.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine optimal iodine density thresholds for active inflammation in CD patients with PCCT enterography and determine if iodine density can be used to stratify CD activity severity.
methodsA retrospective PACS search identified patients with CD imaged with PCCT enterography from 4/11/2022 to 10/30/2022 and with clinical notes, endoscopic/surgical pathology and available source PCCT data for iodine density analysis. Two abdominal radiologists with expertise in CD each drew two region of interest measurements within the visibly most affected region of terminal or neoterminal ileum wall on commercially available system (SyngoVia). Radiologists were blinded to clinical information and pathologic findings. Disease activity and severity were recorded from the pathology report. Harvey-Bradshaw Index, medications, and laboratory values were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to determine the optimum iodine density threshold for active inflammation and mild versus moderate-to-severe inflammation. Intra- and inter-reader agreement was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).
results23 CD patients (15 females; mean [SD] age: 52 [17] years) imaged with PCCT enterography were included. 15/23 had active inflammation: 9/15 mild, 4/15 moderate, and 2/15 severe active inflammation. The optimal iodine density threshold for active inflammation was 2.7 mg/mL, with 97% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 98% accuracy (AUC = 1.00). The optimal iodine density threshold for distinguishing mild from moderate-to-severe inflammation was 3.4 mg/mL, with 83% sensitivity, 89% specificity, and 87% accuracy (AUC = 0.85). Intra-reader reliability (R1/R2) ICC was 0.81/0.86. Inter-reader reliability ICC was 0.94.
conclusionIodine density from PCCT enterography can distinguish mild from moderate-to-severe active inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37814149What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.