Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37814092›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2023

The efficacy and reliability of English YouTube videos as a source of information for pregnant rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Burcu Yagiz, Belkis Nihan Coskun, Esra Yunus Halil, Ediz Dalkilic, Yavuz Pehlivan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Burcu YagizDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey. burcuyilmaz_84@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0624-1986
Belkis Nihan CoskunDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0298-4157
Esra Yunus HalilDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1804-0129
Ediz DalkilicDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8645-2670
Yavuz PehlivanDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-5351

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOnline platforms are used by many patients to access health care information, but the quality and accuracy of information on these platforms are unknown. Our goal was to assess the quality and reliability of YouTube video content for pregnant rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

methodsYouTube was searched on January 13, 2022, using the keywords "rheumatoid arthritis pregnancy," "rheumatoid arthritis conception," "rheumatoid arthritis fertility" and "rheumatoid arthritis breastfeeding". The top 200 videos were viewed. Two rheumatologists then categorized the videos into useful and misleading groups. Videos were excluded if they were irrelevant or duplicates. To assess the reliability and quality of the videos, a modified DISCERN tool and the Global Quality Score (GQS) were applied. Patient interaction was assessed using predictors of video popularity such as the like ratio, view ratio, and video power index scales.

resultsA total of 54 videos were examined; the majority (51.8%) of them were uploaded by health information websites. A total of 94.4% of the videos were useful, and 5.5% were misleading. All three misleading videos were uploaded by patients. The GQS, the modified DISCERN score, and usefulness differed significantly by uploader source (p < 0.001 for both). According to the GQS evaluation, health information websites were the source of high-quality videos with more useful information and higher modified DISCERN scores. The GQS and modified DISCERN score had moderately negative (r = -.526, r = -.548, respectively) and very significant (p < 0.001 for both) correlations with the assessment of usefulness.

conclusionAlmost all YouTube videos for pregnant RA patients were educational and useful. Similar patient interactions in videos with misleading and useful information showed that patients were unable to differentiate between videos based on video quality. Patients should be informed about the importance of video sources when viewing YouTube videos. Key Points • Most YouTube videos for pregnant RA patients were useful, were uploaded by health information websites and had physicians as the speakers • All misleading YouTube videos were uploaded by patients using their own accounts • In terms of patient interactions, there was no noticeable difference between useful and misleading videos • When dealing with a sensitive topic such as pregnancy, patients should be educated on the importance of video sources.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidSocial MediaFemaleHumansInformation DisseminationInformation SourcesPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsBreastfeedingFertilityPregnancyRheumatoid arthritisYouTube

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.