ArticleClinical rheumatology2023
The efficacy and reliability of English YouTube videos as a source of information for pregnant rheumatoid arthritis patients.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Educational value assessment of YouTube surgical videos of bladder hydrodistention for surgeons.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- YouTube as a source of patient information on erythema nodosum: an analysis of quality and reliability.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Tetanus Health Information on YouTube and TikTok: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Quality, Reliability, and Public Health Implications.JMIR infodemiology · 2026Article
- Analysis of YouTube videos on rheumatic diseases and pregnancy: a cross-sectional study.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Bilibili/TikTok videos as sources of HPV-related medical information: a cross-sectional content analysis.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of knee osteoarthritis-related information on short video platforms in China: a multi-method cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Short-form video platforms as a source of ankylosing spondylitis information: a cross-sectional content analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Impacts of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Misinformation in Digital Spaces on Human Rights Protection and Promotion: Scoping Review.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Article
- Educational value assessment of YouTube surgical videos of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Evaluating the quality and reliability of cervical cancer related videos on YouTube, Bilibili, and Tiktok: a cross-sectional analysis.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Educational quality of YouTube videos on scapular dyskinesis: a cross-sectional analysis.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2025Article
- Analyzing Turkish-Language HPV Vaccination Videos on YouTube: Assessing Content Quality and Educational Value.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Assessing the content and quality of GI bleeding information on Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- YouTube and TikTok as sources of information on acute pancreatitis: a content and quality analysis.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Search engines and short video apps as sources of information on acute pancreatitis in China: quality assessment and content assessment.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Letter to the Editor on "The efficacy and reliability of English YouTube videos as a source of information for pregnant rheumatoid arthritis patients".Clinical rheumatology · 2024Article
- Short videos platforms as sources of health information about cervical cancer screening: A content and quality analysis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOnline platforms are used by many patients to access health care information, but the quality and accuracy of information on these platforms are unknown. Our goal was to assess the quality and reliability of YouTube video content for pregnant rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.
methodsYouTube was searched on January 13, 2022, using the keywords "rheumatoid arthritis pregnancy," "rheumatoid arthritis conception," "rheumatoid arthritis fertility" and "rheumatoid arthritis breastfeeding". The top 200 videos were viewed. Two rheumatologists then categorized the videos into useful and misleading groups. Videos were excluded if they were irrelevant or duplicates. To assess the reliability and quality of the videos, a modified DISCERN tool and the Global Quality Score (GQS) were applied. Patient interaction was assessed using predictors of video popularity such as the like ratio, view ratio, and video power index scales.
resultsA total of 54 videos were examined; the majority (51.8%) of them were uploaded by health information websites. A total of 94.4% of the videos were useful, and 5.5% were misleading. All three misleading videos were uploaded by patients. The GQS, the modified DISCERN score, and usefulness differed significantly by uploader source (p < 0.001 for both). According to the GQS evaluation, health information websites were the source of high-quality videos with more useful information and higher modified DISCERN scores. The GQS and modified DISCERN score had moderately negative (r = -.526, r = -.548, respectively) and very significant (p < 0.001 for both) correlations with the assessment of usefulness.
conclusionAlmost all YouTube videos for pregnant RA patients were educational and useful. Similar patient interactions in videos with misleading and useful information showed that patients were unable to differentiate between videos based on video quality. Patients should be informed about the importance of video sources when viewing YouTube videos. Key Points • Most YouTube videos for pregnant RA patients were useful, were uploaded by health information websites and had physicians as the speakers • All misleading YouTube videos were uploaded by patients using their own accounts • In terms of patient interactions, there was no noticeable difference between useful and misleading videos • When dealing with a sensitive topic such as pregnancy, patients should be educated on the importance of video sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37814092What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.