ArticleNeurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation2023
Multiple Sclerosis, Disease-Modifying Therapies, and Infections.
Article in Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Comorbidities, safety and persistence in phase III clinical trials in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Sleep and cognitive outcomes in multiple sclerosis; a systematic review.BMC psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Two Years of Ocrelizumab Treatment in Black and Hispanic People with Multiple Sclerosis in CHIMES: A Single-Arm Clinical Trial.Annals of neurology · 2026Trial
- Five Years of Ublituximab in Multiple Sclerosis: ULTIMATE I and II Open-Label Extension Study.JAMA neurology · 2026Trial
- Risk of infection in ocrelizumab-treated adults with multiple sclerosis aged 55 years and older: a retrospective cohort study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Aging with multiple sclerosis and associated prevalence, incidence, comorbidities and healthcare utilization patterns in a population based study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness and Risk of Severe Infection in Adult Patients With MS Treated With Diroximel Fumarate Versus Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies: A Real-World Claims Analysis.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Comparative Effectiveness of Rituximab Dosed Every 6 and 12 Months in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology · 2026Article
- Low risk of severe COVID-19 in vaccinated people with multiple sclerosis: a nationwide Norwegian study.BMJ neurology open · 2026Article
- Fingolimod Exerts Therapeutic Effects on Autistic Mice via Improving the Structure and Function of Meningeal Lymphatics.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Epstein-Barr virus infection and vitamin D deficiency are both "causal" for multiple sclerosis (MS) - could the common denominator be their effects on hepcidin levels?Metabolic brain disease · 2025Review
- Gynecological health: A missing link in comprehensive treatment monitoring for multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2025Review
- Review
- Infections in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with disease-modifying therapies: A comparative risk assessment cohort study.Current journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Herpes Zoster Infections With Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2025Article
- Myasthenia gravis in 2025: five new things and four hopes for the future.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Recent advances in mesenchymal stem cell therapy for multiple sclerosis: clinical applications and challenges.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Antibiotic Utilization Among People With Multiple Sclerosis in the Netherlands, 2018-2020.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2024Article
- MS treatment de-escalation: review and commentary.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe use of highly effective multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is rapidly increasing. Yet, little is known about their real-world risks of infections. The goals of this study were to assess the comparative risk of outpatient and serious infections across DMTs in a large, diverse, U.S. cohort and determine whether such risks are attributable to DMTs, having MS, or other factors.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of Kaiser Permanente Southern California members from 2008 through 2020 with MS and non-MS controls matched on age, sex, race, and ethnicity. MS treatments, serious (those requiring hospitalization) and outpatient infections, and covariates were collected from the electronic health record. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and risk ratios (aRR) were estimated using the Cox and Poisson regression, respectively.
resultsSix thousand, six hundred and twenty-six patients with MS with 11,929 treatment episodes (2,487 rituximab, 546 natalizumab, 298 fingolimod, 4,629 interferon-beta/glatiramer acetate, IFN/GLAT, and 3,969 untreated) and 33,550 population controls were included in the analyses. The average age at treatment start ranged from 38.9 to 49.2 years, and 74% were women. Untreated (aRR = 1.39, [95% CI = 1.35-1.44]) and IFN/GLAT-treated patients with MS (aRR = 1.60, [95% CI = 1.56-1.65]) had a higher risk of outpatient infections and serious infections (aHR = 2.97, [95% CI = 2.65-3.32 and aHR = 2.31, [95% CI = 2.04-2.62], respectively) compared with controls. Rituximab (aRR = 1.19, [95% CI = 1.14-1.25]), fingolimod (aRR = 1.22, [95% CI = 1.09-1.37]), and to a lesser extent, natalizumab treatment (aRR = 1.08, [95% CI = 0.97-1.20]) were associated with an increased risk of outpatient infections compared with IFN/GLAT. Rituximab (aHR = 1.41, [95% CI = 1.09-1.84]) and natalizumab (aHR = 1.40, [95% CI = 0.96-2.04]) treatment were associated with a similar increased risk of serious infections compared with IFN/GLAT. The only treatment-specific association identified was fingolimod with outpatient herpetic infections. Higher comorbidity index, previous hospitalization for infections, and advanced disability significantly increased the risk of serious infections independent of DMTs. Hospitalization for UTI-related pseudorelapses accounted for 24%-48% of serious infections. DISCUSSION: Patients with MS have higher risks of outpatient and serious infections compared with patients without MS. The risk of outpatient infections was similarly increased by rituximab and fingolimod and serious infections by rituximab and natalizumab compared with IFN/GLAT. Steps to minimize risks include optimizing bladder care, comorbidity prevention, varicella vaccination, and considering discontinuing or avoiding DMT use in patients with advanced disability and/or previous hospitalizations for infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.