Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37813104›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2023

Effects of ensiling sugarcane tops with bacteria-enzyme inoculants on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and the associated rumen microbiome in beef cattle.

Qingfeng Tang, Renchun He, Feng Huang, Qimei Liang, Zhiyang Zhou, Junhua Zhou, Qizhi Wang, Caixia Zou, Qichao Gu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qingfeng TangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China.
Renchun HeThe Animal Husbandry Research Institute, Guangxi Vocational University of Agriculture, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, China.
Feng HuangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China.
Qimei LiangThe Animal Husbandry Research Institute, Guangxi Vocational University of Agriculture, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, China.
Zhiyang ZhouThe Animal Husbandry Research Institute, Guangxi Vocational University of Agriculture, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, China.
Junhua ZhouThe Animal Husbandry Research Institute, Guangxi Vocational University of Agriculture, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, China.
Qizhi WangThe Animal Husbandry Research Institute, Guangxi Vocational University of Agriculture, Nanning, Guangxi 530000, China.
Caixia ZouCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China.
Qichao GuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China.
Guangxi University · CNNanning Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major challenges when ensiling sugarcane tops include fermentation that results in high quantities of alcohol and decrease in nutrient digestibility due to the accumulation of fiber components. Increased efforts to apply bacteria-enzyme inoculants in silage have the potential to improve nutrient digestibility. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ensiling sugarcane tops with bacteria-enzyme inoculants or mixed bacterial inoculants on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and rumen microbiome in beef cattle. Chopped sugarcane tops were ensiled in plastic bags for 60 d after application of 1) no inoculant (control check, CK); 2) bacteria-enzyme inoculants containing Pediococcus acidilactici, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, cellulase, and xylanase (T1, viable colony-forming units of each bacterial strain ≥108 CFU/g; enzyme activity of each enzyme ≥200 U/g); or 3) mixed bacterial inoculants containing Lactobacillus plantarum, Bacillus subtilis, and Aspergillus oryzae (T2, viable colony-forming units of each bacterial strain ≥107 CFU/g). Silages were fed to eighteen Holstein bull calves (n = 6/treatment) weighing 163.83 ± 7.13 kg to determine intake in a 49-d experimental period. The results showed that beef cattle-fed T1 silage or T2 silage had a significantly higher (P < 0.05) average daily gain than those fed CK silage, but the difference in dry matter intake was not significant (P > 0.05). The apparent digestibility of crude protein (CP) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were higher (P < 0.05) for beef cattle-fed T1 silage or T2 silage than for those fed CK silage. The rumen bacterial community of beef cattle-fed T1 silage or T2 silage had a tendency to increase (P > 0.05) abundance of Firmicutes and Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group than those fed CK silage. Rumen fungal communities of beef cattle-fed T1 or T2 silage had a tendency to increase (P > 0.05) abundance of Mortierellomycota and of Mortierella than those fed CK silage. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient showed that the apparent digestibility of ADF for beef cattle was positively correlated with unclassified_p_Ascomycota of the fungal genera (P < 0.05). Neocalimastigomycota of the fungal phyla was strongly positively correlated with the apparent digestibility of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) (P < 0.05). Ruminococcus was positively correlated with the apparent digestibility of CP (P < 0.05). It was concluded that both T1 and T2 improved the growth performance of beef cattle by improving the ruminal apparent digestibility of CP and ADF, and had no significant impact on major rumen microbial communities in beef cattle.

Indexed as

Agricultural InoculantsMicrobiotaSaccharumAnimalsBacteriaCattleDetergentsDigestionFermentationMaleNutrientsRumenSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSilageZea maysDetergentsNutrientsbeef cattlegrowth performanceinoculantnutrient digestibility, ruminal microbialsugarcane top silages

Identifiers

PMID37813104
PMCPMC10636847
OpenAlexW4387445274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.