Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37813094›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2024

Awareness and Perceptions of US Food and Drug Administration's JUUL Marketing Denial Order: A National Study of US Adolescents.

Alissa Rams, Sarah D Kowitt, Caroline Ritchie, Erin L Sutfin, Paschal Sheeran, Seth M Noar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alissa RamsDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9615-4546
Sarah D KowittDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Caroline RitchieLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4722-1770
Erin L SutfinDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Paschal SheeranLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7449-4590
Seth M NoarLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Impact of e-cigarette prevention messages on adolescentsR01DA049155 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI NOAR, SETH MICHAEL · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA049155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe examined awareness and perceptions of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) JUUL marketing denial order (MDO) that occurred in June 2022 among a nationally representative sample of US adolescents. AIMS AND

methodsData were collected in August 2022 via an online survey (n = 1603). Adolescents were asked whether they had heard about the JUUL MDO, and, if yes, where they heard the news. Those who had heard were asked about the MDO's impact on their harm beliefs about JUUL and vape products in general. We examined correlates of awareness of the MDO and of increased JUUL and vape harm perceptions.

resultsTwenty-seven percent of adolescents had heard about the MDO. Older adolescents (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.13) and LGBTQ+ adolescents (aOR = 2.05) had significantly higher odds of having heard the news, while those who identified as Black or African American had significantly lower odds of having heard (aOR = 0.56). Most participants who were aware of the MDO indicated that they had higher harm perceptions about JUUL itself (77.9%) and vapes in general (79.6%). Youths susceptible to vaping and current users were less likely to report increased harm perceptions about JUUL (B = -0.34 and -0.46, respectively) and vapes in general (B = -0.27 and -0.43) compared with youth not susceptible to vaping.

conclusionsThe results of this nationally representative survey demonstrate that over one-quarter of US youth heard about the JUUL MDO and the vast majority of those indicated increased harm perceptions about vapes. Large-scale news events about vaping can reach youth audiences and may impact what youth think about the harms of vaping. IMPLICATIONS: Analysis of a nationally representative survey of adolescents aged 13-17 revealed that more than 25% had heard about the marketing denial order issued to JUUL Labs by the FDA in June of 2022. We also found that the vast majority of adolescents reported increased JUUL and vape harm perceptions in response to hearing about the MDO. This indicates that news coverage about vaping-including coverage of regulatory actions-can reach and potentially impact adolescents. It is therefore important to monitor news coverage about vaping, how it is framed and discussed across media platforms, and its reach among priority populations.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsVapingAdolescentHumansMarketingSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID37813094
PMCPMC10959063
OpenAlexW4387445132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.