Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37812795›Full record

ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2024

Outcomes and patient tolerability of radical inguinal orchiectomy under deep intravenous sedation.

Steven Lu, Alagarsamy Pandian, Jasmir G Nayak, Premal Patel

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Outcomes following inguinal and subinguinal urologic procedures under deep intravenous sedation.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven LuSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Alagarsamy PandianDepartment of Anesthesia, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Jasmir G NayakSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Premal PatelSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
University of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRadical inguinal orchiectomy (RO ) is indicated for the management of testicular tumors and is universally performed under general anesthetic in the hospital. The need to perform radical orchiectomy in an expeditated fashion can result in logistical difficulties, often necessitating this procedure to happen after-hours on a semi-emergent basis. These logistical difficulties have been exacerbated by the backlog of cases from the COVID-19 pandemic. A similar procedure - inguinal hernia repair - is regularly performed under local anesthesia with minimal complications. Thus, we sought to evaluate the feasibility of performing radical orchiectomy under deep intravenous sedation in an ambulatory surgery center.

methodsWe evaluated our single-surgeon (PP), prospective database of patients who underwent RO between September 2022 and February 2023 at the Men's Health Clinic Manitoba. Patients were given a combination of deep sedation, ilioinguinal nerve block, and local anesthetic. Tolerability was assessed both perioperatively and at 4-6 weeks' followup. We reviewed the medical records for any postoperative complications.

resultsEight patients underwent RO under deep sedation during the study period. All patients tolerated the surgery well and were discharged shortly after surgery. Average operative time was 40 minutes and length of stay was 46 minutes. There were no perioperative complications.

conclusionsOur pilot study demonstrates that RO can be safely and effectively performed under deep sedation. This anesthetic combination can be used both in-hospital and out-of-hospital settings, thereby resulting in faster recovery, shorter length of stay, and favorable patient and provider satisfaction.

Identifiers

PMID37812795
PMCPMC10766330
OpenAlexW4387221638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.