Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37812770›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Using machine learning to develop smart reflex testing protocols.

Matthew McDermott, Anand Dighe, Peter Szolovits, Yuan Luo, Jason Baron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew McDermottMIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Boston, MA 02139, United States.
Anand DigheDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Peter SzolovitsMIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Boston, MA 02139, United States.
Yuan LuoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0195-7456
Jason BaronDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4182-6349

Funding

Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ELBERT S. HUANG · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Modeling the Incompleteness and Biases of Health DataR01LM013337 · NLM · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LUO, YUAN · 2020 to 2023
$1.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReflex testing protocols allow clinical laboratories to perform second line diagnostic tests on existing specimens based on the results of initially ordered tests. Reflex testing can support optimal clinical laboratory test ordering and diagnosis. In current clinical practice, reflex testing typically relies on simple "if-then" rules; however, this limits the opportunities for reflex testing since most test ordering decisions involve more complexity than traditional rule-based approaches would allow. Here, using the analyte ferritin as an example, we propose an alternative machine learning-based approach to "smart" reflex testing.

methodsUsing deidentified patient data, we developed a machine learning model to predict whether a patient getting CBC testing will also have ferritin testing ordered. We evaluate applications of this model to reflex testing by assessing its performance in comparison to possible rule-based approaches.

resultsOur underlying machine learning models performed moderately well in predicting ferritin test ordering (AUC=0.731 in reference to actual ordering) and demonstrated promising potential to underlie key clinical applications. In contrast, none of the many traditionally framed, rule-based, hypothetical reflex protocols we evaluated offered sufficient agreement with actual ordering to be clinically feasible. Using chart review, we further demonstrated that the strategic deployment of our model could avoid important ferritin test ordering errors.

conclusionsMachine learning may provide a foundation for new types of reflex testing with enhanced benefits for clinical diagnosis.

Indexed as

Machine LearningReflexFerritinsHumansFerritinsclinical decision supportcomputational pathologyferritinimputationlaboratory test orderingmachine learningmissing data

Identifiers

PMID37812770
PMCPMC10797267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.