Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37812715›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

The "double jeopardy" of midlife and old age mortality trends in the United States.

Leah R Abrams, Mikko Myrskylä, Neil K Mehta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Insights into US life expectancy stagnation from birth cohort mortality dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Health Economics in a World of Uneconomic Growth.Applied health economics and health policy · 2024
    Article
  10. Reply to Timonin and Cooley: Varied effects of counterfactuals in 42 countries underscore value of within-country counterfactual.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Analyzing potential shifts in life expectancy: The role of baseline mortality in addition to relative changes in death rates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Working-age mortality is still an important driver of stagnating life expectancy in the United States.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leah R AbramsDepartment of Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.ORCID 0000-0002-8766-0903
Mikko MyrskyläMax Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock 18057, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4995-027X
Neil K MehtaDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555.ORCID 0000-0001-6671-8435

Funding

UTMB OAIC Research Education Component (REC)P30AG024832 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI JAMES S. GOODWIN, MD, MELISSA M. MORROW · 2005 to 2026
$26.7M
Network on Life Course Health Dynamics and Disparities in 21st Century America RenewalR24AG045061 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JENNIFER A AILSHIRE, Sarah A. Burgard · 2014 to 2026
$5.2M
Identifying the Causes of the Stagnation in National U.S. Cardiovascular Disease MortalityR01AG075208 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI NEIL MEHTA · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024832NIA NIH HHS R01 AG075208NIA NIH HHS R24 AG045061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 2010, US life expectancy growth has stagnated. Much research on US mortality has focused on working-age adults given adverse trends in drug overdose deaths, other external causes of death, and cardiometabolic deaths in midlife. We show that the adverse mortality trend at retirement ages (65+ y) has in fact been more consequential to the US life expectancy stagnation since 2010, as well as excess deaths and years of life lost in 2019, than adverse mortality trends at working ages. These results reveal that the United States is experiencing a "double jeopardy" that is driven by both mid-life and older-age mortality trends, but more so by older-age mortality. Understanding and addressing the causes behind the worsening mortality trend in older ages will be essential to returning to the pace of life expectancy improvements that the United States had experienced for decades.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseLife ExpectancyAdultCause of DeathEthical TheoryHumansMortalityRetirementUnited Statesaging populationlife expectancymortality trends

Identifiers

PMID37812715
PMCPMC10589701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.