ArticlePloS one2023
A simplified network topology for fruit detection, counting and mobile-phone deployment.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complex network topology, deployment unfriendliness, computation cost, and large parameters, including the natural changeable environment are challenges faced by fruit detection. Thus, a Simplified network topology for fruit detection, tracking and counting was designed to solve these problems. The network used common networks of Conv, Maxpool, feature concatenation and SPPF as new backbone and a modified decoupled head of YOLOv8 as head network. At the same time, it was validated on a dataset of images encompassing strawberry, jujube, and cherry fruits. Having compared to YOLO-mainstream variants, the params of Simplified network is 32.6%, 127%, and 50.0% lower than YOLOv5n, YOLOv7-tiny, and YOLOv8n, respectively. The results of mAP@50% tested using test-set show that the 82.4% of Simplified network is 0.4%, -0.2%, and 0.2% respectively more accurate than 82.0% of YOLOv5n, 82.6% of YOLOv7-tiny, and 82.2% of YOLOv8n. Furthermore, the Simplified network is 12.8%, 17.8%, and 11.8% respectively faster than YOLOv5n, YOLOv7-tiny, and YOLOv8n, including outperforming in tracking, counting, and mobile-phone deployment process. Hence, the Simplified network is robust, fast, accurate, easy-to-understand, fewer in parameters and deployable friendly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.