Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37812248›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

A systematic review of qualitative research exploring patient and health professional perspectives of breakthrough cancer pain.

G B Crawford, A Lakhani, L Palmer, M Sebalj, P Rolan

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Breakthrough cancer pain management (BTcP)-gap analysis of the current Australian landscape.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

G B Crawford *Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide Medical School, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. gregory.crawford@adelaide.edu.au.
A Lakhani *The School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, 360 Collins St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
L PalmerFaculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide Medical School, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
M SebaljThe School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, 360 Collins St, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
P RolanFaculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide Medical School, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
University of Adelaide · AUEastern Health · AULa Trobe University · AUModbury Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreakthrough cancer pain (BtCP) is a prevalent health issue which is difficult to manage. A plethora of quantitative research in this area exists. There is a paucity of research on the perspectives of health professionals and patients surrounding domains impacting effective treatment, including definitions of BtCP, treatment, and education opportunities. This review aims to identify and synthesize the extent of qualitative research exploring health professional and patient perspectives of BtCP.

methodsA systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach was undertaken. The approach was registered with Prospero. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched for peer-reviewed literature published any date prior to May 19, 2022. Eligible sources must have considered health professional and/or patient perspectives of BtCP. A narrative synthesis approach was utilized.

resultsThree sources met the review criteria. One source explored nurse perspectives, while two sources explored patient perspectives. Study quality was moderate to high. Overlapping themes across the three studies included communication, defining BtCP, impact of BtCP, management of BtCP, perceptions of BtCP, analgesia and pain relief, and training and professional development.

conclusionGiven limited research investigating clinician and patient perspectives of BtCP, a rich understanding informed by exploratory qualitative methods around identification, best management strategies, professional development, and factors promoting and inhibiting best practice remains unclear. Further qualitative inquiry is warranted, and it is expected such research will inform BtCP clinical guidelines.

Indexed as

Breakthrough PainCancer PainNeoplasmsHumansPain ManagementQualitative ResearchTreatment OutcomeBreakthrough cancer painHealth professionalPalliative carePatientsQualitativeSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37812248
PMCPMC10562491
OpenAlexW4387440585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.