ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2023
The safety and efficacy of decortication for stage III drug-resistant tuberculous empyema.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe goal of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of decortication for stage III drug-resistant tuberculous empyema (TE).
methodsWe analysed all patients with stage III TE who underwent decortication between March 2015 and October 2019 at Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to drug-susceptibility testing of bronchoscopy lavage fluid, pleural effusion and tissue specimens, including a drug-resistant group and a drug-sensitive group. We collected and compared the preoperative, perioperative and postoperative data from the 2 groups to evaluate the safety and efficacy of decortication for stage III drug-resistant TE.
resultsIn total, 135 cases met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled, including 30 cases in the drug-resistant group and 105 cases in the drug-sensitive group. No deaths were recorded for the entire study population. Compared to the drug-sensitive group, the drug-resistant group had longer operation times (259.8 ± 78.4 min vs 187.2 ± 56.0 min, P = 0.00), a larger volume of intraoperative blood loss [300 (200,400) ml vs 200 (130, 300) ml, P = 0.00] and a higher intraoperative transfusion rate (5/30, 16.7% vs 4/105, 3.8%, P = 0.04). The rate of complications was significantly higher in the drug-resistant group (23; 76.7%) than in the drug-sensitive group (53; 50.5%) (P = 0.01). Recurrence was not reported in any of the patients. Twenty-three (76.7%) patients in the drug-resistant group and 90 (85.7%) patients in the drug-sensitive group recovered to an "excellent" level, and 3 cases in each group recovered to a "poor" level; there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in surgical effects (P = 0.21).
conclusionsDecortication is a safe, effective and feasible option for patients with stage III drug-resistant TE, although the operation is difficult and risky.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.